Sentence examples for located entities from inspiring English sources

Are located entities identical to their locations, as supersubstantivalists maintain?

One especially bold idea is that the mereological properties of, and relations between, located entities perfectly match those of their locations.

But if there are such cases, then (given the symmetry and transitivity of mereological coincidence) at least one of the located entities in question must fail to coincide mereologically with the location in question.

Both appear to be concrete, temporally and spatially located entities organized into part-whole hierarchies.

And if we assume that sets of spatiotemporally located entities are spatiotemporally located (because they are wherever and whenever their members are), then sets of concrete objects are concrete.

Thing-Region Coincidentalism is similar to Supersubstantivalism+, in that it holds that all located entities are 'fundamentally made up of spacetime', but it is consistent with the view that in some cases an entity even a material object is not identical to its exact location.

In what ways (if any) must the mereological structure of a located entity mirror the mereological structure of its location?

It would appear to follow from this that the type must be a concrete, spatially located entity, since anything that can be a particular instantiation of a spatial property must be located in space.

In the spirit of van Inwagen (1981), one might take the fundamental location relation to be lying-within, where this holds only between a mereologically simple spacetime point, on the one hand, and a located entity, on the other.

Named entity recognition (NER, locating entities in text) is typically performed before information extraction.

After we locate entities, we collect all synonyms by extracting all entities which have the same CUI in the UMLS database.