Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
Thus, OC-based localization method performed better at the sampling rate of 8 kHz (localization failure ≤30%) as compared to 4 kHz (localization failure ≤40%).
Comparing with center room configuration, less localization failure rate of 20% is achieved.
Comparing this case with the center room configuration, the localization failure has significantly decreased from 30%to12%2%.
Figure 18 shows the rate of localization failure for both OC and CC methods under different sub-sampling rates.
Gradient theories, as a regularized continuum mechanics approach, have found wide applications for modeling strain localization failure process.
The present analyses confirm that the imperfection results in localization failure, even at moderate or rather low stress triaxiality.
Similar(49)
A high percentage of localization failures of more than 75% are observed with CC.
Figure 15 Localization failures in CC and OC for microphone configuration II. Figure 16 Microphone configuration III for source localization.
Figure 15 shows the comparison between the localization failures of OC and CC under different sampling rates.
These reverberations result in an increased rate of localization failures from 50% (center room configuration) to 60%.
In contrast, OC gives acceptable location estimates in many cases with relatively less percentage, 40% of localization failures.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com