Sentence examples for literature were coded from inspiring English sources

A total of 15 background variables, which were commonly viewed as predictors of both childhood maltreatment and offending behaviors in the literature, were coded.

For comparative analysis purposes, three additional shortest path algorithms – the commonly cited in the literature – are coded and tested.

In addition, seven yes/no involvement items (e.g., read TSG literature, had a sponsor) were coded from 0 (no, never) to 1 (yes).

Additionally, seven yes/no involvement items (e.g. read TSG literature, had a sponsor) were coded as 0 for no/never or 1 for yes and summed.

Based on the body of literature previously mentioned, these data were coded as "conflict" and "integration," respectively.

With the exception of T. tardabilis, which was coded from photographs and the literature [45], all other species were coded based on first-hand observations by at least two of the authors.

Some missing data for the immature stages of Chaoborus astictopus were coded from literature sources.

The latter two variables were coded using information from the literature.

Verbatim transcripts were coded using a theoretical framework derived from the literature and supplemented by data-driven concepts and codes.

The narratives were coded by hand based on the overview of barriers found in the literature.

All habitat data for Decapodiformes was coded from the literature [ 60, 107]: all Octopodiformes data was coded by FGH.