Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
In rate parameter optimizations found in the published literature, rate constants of single elementary reactions are usually systematically optimized to achieve good agreement between model performance and experimental measurements.
In this large body of literature, rate variation across lineages has only been considered as a methodological issue.
The estimated cost impact of suboptimal dialysis initiation in this analysis (which is based on a literature rate of 30%) is likely a marked underestimation.
Our simulations show that the model of interaction between the actin and myosin filaments described in the text is plausible given the quantitative parameter values known from literature (rate constants).
The simulations are not supposed to lead to a new hypothesis, but rather (in first iteration) show that the already suggested model of interaction between the actin and myosin filaments is plausible, given the quantitative parameter values known from literature (rate constants).
Similar(55)
As above explained, although our model cannot quantify the therapeutic benefit of a given targeted therapy, it can be used to discern trends in the available evidence, pinpointing the most promising approaches based on the amount of literature (rated according to the scoring method described above) in favor of each therapeutic hypothesis.
23 In international literature, rates of unclear margins from 10.6 to 38%% are described.
In a more recent review of the literature, rates of between 17% and 46% were reported [ 7].
This is in accordance with the literature, rating age as a significant predictor of outcome following cartilage repair [ 19].
This result contrasts with adherence rates usually reported in the literature: rates of adherence for psychiatric illnesses are seldom above 65% and sometimes as low as 35% [ 24].
While somewhat lower compared to those found in the pediatric literature, rates of the occurrence of ADHD in OCD samples are inconsistent, ranging from 0%to23%3%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com