Three main causes of failure are reported in the literature: errors of indications, technical errors, and structural failure of the implant.
In the classical literature on error analysis, typically, simple linear equations are studied.
Most proposed quality assessment approaches in the literature are error sensitivity-based methods.
However, in the literature, few error concealment schemes for DVC can be found.
Numerous studies have been reported in the literature on error sources in laser triangulation probes utilizing artifacts of varying shape (form), color, reflectivity, surface finish, etc.
The literature regarded error detection as a spontaneous process that occurs either while an action is executed (action-based detection) or after action feedback (outcome-based detection).
In most existing literature, the error bound in the necessary condition for an admissible control to be ε-optimal is (varepsilon^{gamma}) with (gammain[0,frac{1}{3})) or (gammain[0,frac{1}{3}]), while it is improved in this paper to (varepsilon^{gamma}) with (gammain[0,frac{1}{2}]).
▪ There is a paucity of literature on error rates in such clinical datasets used in research.
Furthermore, team performance is influenced by factors such as team leadership and shared cognition [ 19, 29, 30], and lessons can be drawn from the psychology literature on error avoidance and performance-enhancing strategies [ 8].
This conclusion is neither supported by the data of Krishnan and colleagues nor by the large body of literature concerning error in medicine [ 6], concerning low compliance of clinicians with recommended treatments [ 7], concerning variation in practice [ 10], and concerning comparisons of outcomes with and without protocols [ 9, 11- 18].
