The phrase "literally the same thing" is correct and usable in written English
You can use it to emphasize that two things are exactly alike or identical in every way.
Example: "When it comes to the final outcome, the two methods are literally the same thing."
Alternatives: "exactly the same" or "truly identical."
George the Poet holds their attention by combining the untrammelled positivity of the motivational speaker with the smooth-talking charm of a really good phone salesman ("Literally – the same thing we've all seen on YouTube 65 times already," he grumbles self-deprecatingly at one point into an imaginary mobile handset).
SiGierp for toldbest of VICE, delivered to your inbox daily.
According to a Google image search, Morley (he hosts American news show 60 Minutes, to save you the Wikipedia trip) has been wearing literally the same thing every day since the dawn of photography.
I quite literally did the same thing that most writers do, which is write what they know.
Presser saw that, while "not allow" and "forbid" might literally mean the same thing, the difference in the connotations of the words — the intimidating, legalistic tone of "forbid," compared with the gentler, parental tone of "not allow" — was significant enough to reverse a person's stated opinion on an issue and alter the majority result of a survey.
On Grice's story 'but' and 'and' literally mean the same thing, but different "conventional implicatures" are associated with them; 'but' implicates a sense of contrast between the conjuncts.
People had literally placed thin pieces of cloth over a few branches to protect them from the sun and forge a tiny amount of privacy – but that's the only thing separating them from their neighbours, who have literally constructed the same thing only a foot away.
Follow Charles DavIs on Twitter.
(Notice that the dispute between fictionalism and paraphrase nominalism is best understood as a straightforward empirical dispute about the ordinary-language semantics of sentences like (P); the question is whether such utterances literally say the same things that the corresponding sentences like (N) say).
Armed with these distinctions, Aristotle would then say that, in the case of accidental changes, (1) and (2) are both false a changing thing can really change one of its "accidental properties" and yet literally remain one and the same thing before and after the change.
Pastrami Katz's Delicatessen New York, NY Then, after you've gotten that out of your system -- literally and figuratively -- the same thing at one of New York's myriad less-iconic, less-expensive, and possibly better Jewish delis.
