Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(29)
The new liquid model and other commonly used liquid models are compared with the experimental data outlined in the literature.
The standard deviations between the theory calculation and the liquid model test range from 0.071 to 0.746.
Due to the flexibility in the design we propose this method, which would allow one to check the predictions of the Luttinger liquid model.
The homogeneous liquid model of Akers and Turner[1] and the shared surface model of Bernhardt et al.[2] are found to adequately quantify the condensate film coefficient.
Two Monte Carlo simulation methods have been used: one, purely statistical, based on the Flory Stockmayer (FS) theory and the second using the dynamic lattice liquid model (DLL).
However, they also reveal that the liquid model sensitivities hold in LES, where a tight coupling exists between combustion model predictions and spray model assumptions.
Similar(31)
We store some representative liquid models in advance.
The objective of this work is to explore a compressible gas-liquid model designed for modeling of well flow processes.
Thermo physical properties as well as transport properties were taken from the electrolyte non-random-two-liquid model provided by the Aspen Properties® database.
The results are analyzed according to the two-band model (Fermi-liquid model) and the two-band model with an extra linear term.
Based on the representative elementary volume approach and pseudo-single-liquid model, a computational model of heat and mass transfer for the CO2 capture by aqueous ammonia solution in an industrial packed column is developed, by which the ammonia and CO2 volume fractions and temperatures, ammonia escape mass transfer coefficient and heat transfer per unit volume are obtained.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com