Sentence examples for linguistic cues from inspiring English sources

Among the tools the successful seeker of government funding might choose to employ: linguistic cues, patterns of information flow, topic trend analysis, sentiment detection and opinion mining.

However, less is known about how such social knowledge interacts with linguistic cues during comprehension.

Therefore, again, this indicates that other than world knowledge, linguistic cues are important features to determine semantic relations for CPCs.

While coding, linguistic cues such as modality (modals, adverbs), sentence structure and subjects, and reporting verbs were accounted for.

In this study, we evaluate linguistic cues extracted from transcriptions of 911 homicidea calls as potential indicators of deception.

The original mode of communication (i.e., written vs. spoken language) is particularly important with respect to linguistic cues that distinguish between truth tellers and deceivers.

The concessive meaning would be overridden if there was no linguistic cue to bring about a conflict between presuppositions of the word meaning and the at-issue expression.

To discern these deceptive patterns in communication, many recent studies involving automated linguistic cue analyses have leveraged a general-purpose, psychosocial dictionary such as LIWC [5],[25]-[27] ,[25]-[27]

The ability to pick up on this linguistic cue may expand considerably the amount of conceptual information about artifacts that children derive from conversations with adults.

Based on these theories and building on previous research on deception detection using linguistic cue analysis, our research question is as follows: Can automated linguistic analysis techniques accurately classify deceptive versus truthful callers in transcripts of 911 homicide calls?

In summary, the present findings indicate that a linguistic cue in the form of a letter name makes an otherwise invisible letter visible.