The phrase "linguistic correctness" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it whenever you're discussing the use of proper grammar and syntax in language, including in the context of writing and speaking. For example, "Attention to linguistic correctness is key when writing a speech to ensure that your ideas are clearly communicated to your audience."
Sellars argues that this gets the order of explication exactly wrong: apparently purely descriptive claims about property instantiation are, in fact, misleading ways of communicating norms of linguistic correctness.
We consider the linguistic correctness of the translation and the fidelity of the translated content are appropriate for this evaluation of the translation quality.
This instrument consists of two sections: (1) Quantity, which addresses: "Are the components of the diagnosis present?" (scale: 1 4) and (2) Quality, which addresses: "What is the quality of the description with respect to relevancy, unambiguity, and linguistic correctness?" (scale: 1 4).
However, some portions of the Hindi transcripts were translated separately, by two project assistants, and some were back translated to check linguistic reliability and correctness in translation.
Nor was the word limited to economics: in the earliest entry in the O.E.D., from a 1951 Archivum Linguisticum, a roundheeled lexicographer sneered at "Linguistic dirigisme, standards of correctness in a constantly evolving language".
As there is no standard for computing the accuracy of such kind of system, we have taken the judgments of five human linguistic experts on the correctness of retrieved n sentences and considered the accuracy as the average of their judgments.
Within the appropriate mathematical framework proving the correctness of any linguistic program, relative to its specification, is theoretically possible.
On Ginsborg's account, however, the (primitive) normative attitudes required for genuinely meaningful use of linguistic expressions do not determine semantic correctness conditions for these expressions –– that job is to be done by the speaker's basic dispositions to use them.
These writers excel at the art of making virtue of necessity: out of a need to understand how the new language works, they turn into linguistic maniacs; out of a concern for correctness, they become compulsive grammarians.
Linguistic theorists who define the terminology of political correctness suggest that grammatical choices made in language influence both the speaker's and the listener's ideas and actions.
To evaluate the correctness of incremental representation, social text similarity/relatedness, linguistic tasks, network event detection, social user multi-label classification and user clustering for social network analysis are employed as benchmarks in this paper.
