Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
With these lines of proofs, Algorithm AWCR generates a point sequence and every point of the point sequence consists of the K non-negative numbers, e.g., S 1 ( n ), …, S K ( n ).
Similar(59)
Its proof completely follows the lines of proof of Theorem 1 and hence it is omitted.
The lines of proof are not effected and therefore the proofs are omitted.
Hence similar to the lines of proof of Theorems 5 and 7 our result follows.
Follows the lines of proof of Theorem 3.9 [8], so is omitted.
Following the lines of proof of Theorem 2.1, we get that problem (1.1) has a solution in W 0 1, p.
Moreover, following the lines of proof of the lemma in [4], we get ∫ Ω u 1 r d x < ∞ if and only if r > − 1. □.
By following the lines of proof as above, and passing to a subsequence if necessary, we know that there is such that as j → ∞.
From (ii), by following the same lines of proof as in Theorem 3.9, we get that (u in operatorname{Fix}(T)).
By following the lines of proof as above (passing to a subsequence if necessary), we know that there exists u ˜ ∈ GVI K ( A, g, S ) such that g ( u α j ) → g ( u ˜ ) as j → ∞.
There is no doubt that the requested experiments could provide additional examples of the concepts we demonstrated, but they would not add new lines of proof.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com