The slope of the line of correlation between our results and those of Jeffares et al. [ 18] was 0.81 suggesting that the Nei-Gojobori analysis overestimates dN/dS to a small degree compared to PAML.
At time TR, the response point at θ = θR, spermatozoa with the faster swimming velocity will reach the farther point in a constant delay time of latency, TR TS; thus, the relation can be expresses by the equation: (1) By calculating the slope and y-intercept of the regression line of correlation of ω versus θR, we can determine TR TS and θS, respectively.
The final T1 or ΔT1 was unrelated to cell density, or indeed the total number of cells, with flat lines of correlation and wide scatter (results not shown).
Meanwhile, graphical representation with 95% error bars (Fig. 4) showed that in the first subset (pairs including at least one arm muscle) correlation always crossed the 0 reference line (lack of correlation), while the second subset was consistently characterised by high correlation levels up to the most correlated pair, i.e EUC-OPP (untransformed r = 0.786).
In our view it would be sufficient to plot effect size against publication year, as shown in Figure 2, and to calculate the significance level and the equation of the regression line of this correlation.
Similarly, we can determine θS and TC TS, which we also expected to be constants, as shown in Fig. 2, using the following equation: (2) By calculating the slope and y-intercept of the regression line of the correlation of 1/ω versus TC T0, we can determine TC TS and θS, respectively.
In a comprehensive study, involving several transgenic lines of Arabidopsis, correlation was found between chromosomal environment, such as close-by repeats and locus susceptibility to undergo RNA-directed TGS.
Straight lines with coefficients of correlation (c.c).
Straight lines with coefficients of correlation higher than 0.99 are obtained.
Following the general line of thought a correlation between negative symptoms and executive – or so called frontal lobe - impairments would have been expected, since negative symptoms are assumed to be a consequence of frontal lobe impairment [ 68].
The lines are linear regression lines with a coefficients of correlation R2 = 0.638 for 13C2/12C2 with slope (zero intercept) = 2.028, and R2 = 0.47 for 13C3/12C3 with slope (zero intercept) = 3.055.
