Sentence examples for limits of criticism from inspiring English sources

No critic has ever been wiser about the limits of criticism, and about how few rules can ever be made for writing; Johnson is the model of a reactive critic, seeing when a piece of writing was made, and how it works, then and now.

Bout Number One sees theatre academic and playwright Dan Rebellato knock the stuffing out of Quentin Letts, theatre critic for the Daily Mail, in a post entitled The Limits of Criticism.

Ms. Sánchez, taking a jab at Ms. Díaz's ties to the government, called her the "official Cuban blogger" and wrote that "Elaine Díaz has transgressed the limits of criticism permissible" for an employee of the state.

Elaine Diaz has transgressed the limits of criticism permissible to anyone working in the official media or in an academic center in Cuba.

But the absurdity of the process was soon apparent: it is almost impossible to persuade someone else of the quality or poverty of a selected novel (a useful lesson in the limits of literary criticism).

He said the information was not controversial and "within the limits of the criticism reflecting the right to freedom of expression and information", but that the site's name was "insulting and degrading".

Lingens v. Austria (1986) was relied upon in support of the premise that "the limits of acceptable criticism are accordingly wider as regards a politician as such than as regards a private individual".

As of this writing, Zha's article remains the definitive discussion of the most difficult question facing anyone who runs up against the outer limits of politically tolerable criticism: How can it be worth it?

In a speech Saturday before the How to Take Back America conference, Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) made comments that went far beyond the limits of traditional White House criticism.

"It's an attempt to redefine the limits of what kind of criticism is tolerable," he said.

She also noted that English authorities impose another limit on the content of criticism – that the acts or words in question must neither impute improper motives to nor impugn the integrity, propriety and impartiality of judges or the courts.