Sentence examples for limiting instruction from inspiring English sources

Before such evidence is admitted, however, a judge will provide what is known as a limiting instruction, meaning that the jury can use the evidence only for the limited purpose of establishing part of the case -- in this instance, motive.

This limiting instruction is clear.

Tompkins's attorney did not request that the judge give a limiting instruction to the jury that the evidence of Purifoy's acquittal be considered only as to his credibility and not as substantive evidence of Thompkins' guilt.

Whether a state court's determination that a defendant's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights were not violated — where he was interrogated for three hours while silent before making an incriminating statement and where his lawyer failed to request a limiting instruction — is entitled to deference under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Michigan argues that in order to find that Thompkins' lawyer's decision not to request a limiting instruction regarding Purifoy's acquittal was prejudicial to Thompkins' case, the Court would have to endorse the theory that the jury disregarded its oath and the parties' arguments.

Limiting instructions and instructions to disregard inadmissible evidence are widely believed to be both ineffective and necessary.

Nor may proper limiting instructions or jury charges never be "an adequate response" to a prejudice inquiry.

Thompkins contends that the evidence of Purifoy's acquittal was at the center of the prosecution's case, and therefore, his attorney's failure to request limiting instructions was objectively unreasonable and extremely prejudicial to his case.

And where postconspiracy declarations have been admitted, we have carefully ascertained that limiting instructions kept the jury from considering the contents with respect to the guilt of anyone but the declarant.

There the Court recognized that, in the context of mass trials (as in Kotteakos ), limiting instructions on evidence admissible only as to one defendant might in some circumstances be inadequate to prevent prejudice.

See Skidmore v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 2 Cir., 167 F.2d 54.' (Concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Jackson relating to limiting instructions concerning use of declarations of co-conspirators). Shepard v. United States, 290 U.S. 96, 104, 54 S.Ct.