limited than

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "limited than" is not correct in English and should not be used.
It is likely a confusion with comparative structures, where "more limited than" would be appropriate. Example: "This option is more limited than the previous one."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Openers were even more limited than entrees.

The New York Times

The market for Hernández is more limited than it seems.

The New York Times - Sports

The Met inquiry will be much more limited than Goddard's.

The Guardian

Parental control is more limited than it appears.

The New York Times

Importantly, though, the Xbox version is more limited than the current PC iteration.

The Guardian - Tech

Cingular also offers a data service, though it is more limited than the Verizon Wireless service.

The New York Times

The role of Islam is more limited than some members of the governing council wanted.

The New York Times

The president's plan is somewhat more limited than the approach favored by some Democrats in Congress.

The New York Times

Until now these military actions have been more limited than the previous round.

The New York Times

Both arrangements are more limited than mergers that have become common in recent years.

The New York Times

It also drained their reserves, which were more limited than beneficiaries of his largess quite realized.

The New York Times - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct comparative form, which is "more limited than". This ensures grammatical accuracy and clarity.

Common error

Do not omit "more" when comparing adjectives like "limited". Saying "limited than" is grammatically incorrect. Use "more limited than" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "limited than" is an incorrect comparative construction. Comparative adjectives typically require "more" before the adjective when using "than". As Ludwig AI says, "limited than" should not be used.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "limited than" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in writing and speech. The correct comparative form is "more limited than". As Ludwig AI highlights, using the proper comparative structure ensures clarity and grammatical accuracy. Given its incorrectness, "limited than" is unsuitable for any formal or informal context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

more limited than

Adds "more" to form the correct comparative construction.

more restricted than

Substitutes "limited" with "restricted", maintaining a similar meaning.

less extensive than

Replaces "limited" with "extensive" and reverses the comparison.

more finite than

Replaces "limited" with "finite" which refers to defined boundaries or extent.

not as broad as

Uses a different comparative structure to express a similar idea.

smaller in scope than

Focuses on the scope or range of the limitation.

not as comprehensive as

Highlights the completeness or thoroughness of something being compared.

to a lesser extent than

Uses a more formal phrasing to indicate a reduced degree.

more concise than

Replacing "limited" with "concise" focuses on the brevity in comparation.

more compact than

Replacing "limited" with "compact" emphasizes the compressed or reduced nature.

FAQs

How can I correctly use the word "limited" in a comparison?

To correctly compare something using the word "limited", you should use the phrase "more limited than". For example, "This feature is more limited than that one."

What are some alternatives to saying "limited than"?

Since "limited than" is grammatically incorrect, you can use phrases like "more limited than", "less extensive than", or "not as broad as" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "limited than"?

No, it is not correct to say "limited than". The correct comparative form is "more limited than". The word "more" is essential for making a proper comparison.

What's the difference between "limited than" and "more limited than"?

"Limited than" is grammatically incorrect and should not be used. "More limited than" is the correct comparative form, indicating that something has fewer capabilities or a smaller scope compared to something else.