The historical nature of adaptive radiations has limited analyses to comparative approaches [3], [9], [10].
For screenings indicated by age, we limited analyses to women in the appropriate age ranges.
For the functional ovarian cyst analysis, the number of cases limited analyses to descriptive statistics.
Low numbers of ESRD and CVD events have limited analyses of these outcomes to date.
If the amount of sample was limited, analyses were prioritized based upon significance in nonclinical studies.
Small sample sizes limited analyses by further breakdown of these facilities.
This caused statistical power problems which limited analyses stratified by sex and educational level, and gave wide confidence intervals.
As a sensitivity analysis, we limited analyses to HIV-seropositive women with normal cytology and found similar results.
Cancer treatment data were only available for subjects in the local cancer registry, which limited analyses using these data.
We limited analyses to tumor sites where there were more than five cases in each category of exposure.
For this particular study, we limited analyses to include only subjects who were of Mexican descent (97%).
