limitations of science

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "limitations of science" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the boundaries or constraints of scientific inquiry and understanding. Example: "While science has made incredible advancements, we must acknowledge the limitations of science in addressing certain philosophical questions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

16 human-written examples

Rather, the limitations of science and predictions reflect actual limits on observability and controllability with respect to the complexity of all natural systems (Mandelbrot 1983).

Ergonomics

The general reader will find here a constructive critique of the limitations of science by a very successful and accomplished scientist.

The New York Times - Books

If homeopathy does work, you'll soon see me on a street corner near you, off my face on echinacea and slurring peacefully about the limitations of science.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Overwhelmed by the limitations of science, he tackled Eastern philosophy instead, spending time in India before returning to a US college.

Independent

A few students listed factors related to critical or "logical" thinking or to the nature of science, the limitations of science, or "how science works".

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Teaching these aspects of NOS could help teachers understand science as a way of knowing by examining the scope and limitations of science in answering certain questions.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

The problem, said Dr. Barnett S. Kramer, director of the Office of Medical Applications of Research at the National Institutes of Health, is a limitation of science.

The New York Times

Three interviewees addressed the limitation of science to matters of the "physical" or "natural world," and two of them stressed the importance of keeping "religious" or "spiritual" ideas "separate from" science.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

"I'd rather play football," Rainey said, and then surrounded himself with believers to work against time, his own body and the limitations of prosthetic science.

The New York Times - Magazine

SKEPTICS This group is most interested in the limitations of climate science so far: they like to examine in detail the contradictions and shortcomings in climate data and models, and they are wary about any "consensus" in science.

The New York Times

Mr. Watson, whose interests and academic degrees embraced animal behavior, anthropology, chemistry, botany and geology, chafed at the limitations of traditional science, which he considered inadequate to address the mysteries of the natural world.

The New York Times - Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "limitations of science" to introduce a balanced perspective, acknowledging both the power and the boundaries of scientific inquiry.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "limitations of science" to dismiss scientific findings entirely. Instead, acknowledge limitations while still valuing the contributions of science.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "limitations of science" functions as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It identifies and refers to the inherent constraints, boundaries, or shortcomings associated with scientific methodology and knowledge. As Ludwig AI confirms, the expression is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

30%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "limitations of science" is a grammatically correct and usable term for discussing the inherent constraints and boundaries of scientific methodology and knowledge. While Ludwig AI affirms its correctness, it's essential to use the phrase with specificity and balance, avoiding overgeneralizations that could undermine the value of scientific contributions. The phrase is most frequently found in scientific and news contexts, maintaining a formal and often neutral tone. Recognizing the "limitations of science" allows for a more nuanced and responsible interpretation of research findings and a more balanced perspective on the role of science in addressing complex questions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

inherent limits of science

Stresses that some limitations are intrinsic to the scientific method itself.

limits of scientific knowledge

Specifically addresses the finite nature of what science can know.

boundaries of science

Emphasizes the borders beyond which scientific inquiry cannot venture.

constraints on science

Highlights the restrictions and limitations imposed on scientific investigation.

scope of science

Focuses on what science encompasses and what falls outside its domain.

shortcomings of science

Focuses on the imperfections and areas where science falls short.

weaknesses of science

Points out the vulnerabilities and less robust aspects of scientific methods.

scientific unknowns

Highlights the areas where science has not yet provided answers.

unsolved problems in science

Emphasizes the challenges and questions that science is still trying to resolve.

the reach of science

Addresses the extent to which scientific understanding can extend.

FAQs

How can I use "limitations of science" in a sentence?

You might say, "Understanding the "limitations of science" is crucial for interpreting research findings responsibly", or "The ethical "limitations of science" prevent certain types of experiments".

What are some phrases similar to "limitations of science"?

Alternatives include "scope of science", "boundaries of science", or "limits of scientific knowledge", each emphasizing a slightly different aspect.

Is it appropriate to discuss the "limitations of science" in a formal context?

Yes, discussing the "limitations of science" is appropriate and often necessary in academic, scientific, and professional discussions to provide a balanced and nuanced perspective.

How do the "limitations of science" affect research?

Acknowledging the "limitations of science" helps researchers design more rigorous studies, interpret results cautiously, and avoid overstating the implications of their findings.