Sentence examples for limitations consistency from inspiring English sources

The GRADE approach uses five considerations (study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness and publication bias) to assess the quality of the body of evidence for each outcome.

The quality of the body of evidence for each outcome will be assessed based on five factors: study limitations, consistency of effect, imprecision, indirectness and publication bias.

We will give justifications for changing the level of evidence depending on findings about: study limitations; consistency of results; directness of evidence; imprecision; publication bias.

29 This approach, which is based largely on the approach developed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group, incorporates five domains: study limitations, consistency, directness, precision, and reporting bias.

The quality of evidence for primary outcomes will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines, 37 which include the following domains: design; study limitations; consistency; directness; precision and publication bias.

46 If meta-analysis is not possible, we will present results in a narrative 'Summary of findings' table format, such as that used by Chan et al. 47 The GRADE system will be used to assess and report on the quality of the evidence for each outcome using the following domains: study limitations, consistency, imprecision, indirectness and publication bias.

PI still has limitations in consistency and reproducibility because of its high dependence on subjective diagnostic indicators.

Though such studies have limitations, the consistency of findings reinforces the plausibility of patient safety differences between these VEGF inhibitor agents.

15 In this system, the quality of evidence is assessed for each relevant outcome and is based on study design, limitations, and consistency and directness of the evidence, which informs the confidence the group has in the evidence presented.

In spite of these limitations, the consistency between our findings and the previous findings that many of the genes we detected are also abnormally expressed in other OA cell types/tissues [ 4, 5, 23, 28, 34- 36, 40] suggests that many of the differential gene expressions detected in this study are disease-specific.

Despite these obvious limitations, the consistency of the results and the high percentage of variance explained by the factors included (between ca. 60 and 98%, Table 5) allows to draw firm conclusions applicable to a wide range of phylogenetically independent groups of Coleoptera.