Since the methodology allows limited human intervention, it is slightly less rigid than an algorithm.
Or, with limited human intervention, I should say.
The autonomic computing paradigm promises an approach in which the system adapts itself and acts as self-managing entity, thereby limiting human interventions and taking actions.
The proposed procedure significantly simplifies the CVS design and the optimization of its performance, limiting the subjective human intervention to the minimum.
The described procedure combines both automated and manual tasks, allowing to have all SMILES strings curated by human experts, but limiting the need of human intervention only to those cases that cannot be satisfactorily resolved in an automated way.
These include long forecasting horizons (up to 52 periods ahead), a high number of quantities to be forecasted, which limits the possibility of human intervention, as well as frequent introduction of new articles (for which no past sales are available for parameter calibration) and withdrawal of running articles.
The introduced control loops provide an automated mechanism to detect low performance and to take action, thereby limiting human technical interventions.
The proposed measures include requiring that all high-frequency traders be licensed, requiring clear labeling of all financial products traded by powerful algorithms without human intervention and limiting the number of orders that may be placed without a corresponding trade.
Technology-based interventions might not limit human connections, but rather, they might convey caring and concern for well-being because of the constant contact between patients and providers.
Even if the described system seems exceedingly complex, we believe that computer architectures inspired by molecular biology will allow the development of new FPGAs endowed with quasi-biological properties extremely useful in environments where human intervention is necessarily limited (nuclear plants, space applications, etc).
