Power analysis indicated that the data were approximately 100 times more likely given the hypothesis of no MAE change than the hypothesis of a 10% relative change.
This indicates that the data are 4.5 times more likely in the hypothesis that there is a difference between men and women than in the equal preference hypothesis.
We only noticed differences between them in perceived competence in the use of "university email", where there was a Bayes factor of 12.55, meaning that the data were 12.55 times more likely in the hypothesis of differences between men and women than in the hypothesis of equal competence, with a size of effect of −.26 (−.13, −.1).
We observed that there were differences regarding seeing a tutor to resolve doubts, with a Bayes factor of 4.50, which indicates that the data are 4.5 times more likely in the hypothesis that there is a difference between men and women than in the hypothesis of equal preference.
It is because of this that the mere articulation of a plausible alternative hypothesis can dramatically reduce how likely the original hypothesis is on the available data.[7] Consider an historical example that is often thought to illustrate this phenomenon.
It computes Pseudo-F values (the larger the F value, the more likely the null hypothesis of no differences among the group means is false; Anderson 2001) and permutational p-values, which were used to compare the discriminatory power of "overall abundance data" and single taxonomic groups.
As commented earlier, this value quantifies how likely the null hypothesis is true.
Although transcription factor sites have not been systematically determined for fungi outside the model yeasts, it seems likely this hypothesis stands for the diverse Ascomycetes analyzed here.
This makes the possibility of random invasion at the beginning of seasons less likely and strengthens the hypothesis that these corals had never healed completely and thus act as 'winter reservoirs'.
In our case, translocation seems the most likely hypothesis; the tip of the CVC was sterile, and cultures from different sites (bronchial secretions, peritoneal fluids, and urine) were all negative.
Thus, it appears that the scavenging of prostanoid precursors by the parasite from the host was the most likely hypothesis for the observed effects.
