Sentence examples for lifetime hazard from inspiring English sources

Increases in the level of Chi3l1 were associated with significant increases in lifetime hazard estimates across all therapies with the highest hazard ratio observed in individuals receiving no therapy (None, HR = 2.42).

The lifetime hazard estimate decreased with increased levels of Sox10 in Caucasian individuals (HR = 0.55) compared to non-Caucasian individuals, and this pattern is concordant with broad distribution of Sox10 in high grade gliomas [ 68].

Table 4 summarises some of these from a theoretical standpoint and suggests that, for a checklist of preoperative and lifetime hazards, external support has a favourable profile.

Thus, we contend that while the older students may have been exposed to greater occupational and sport lifetime hazards than their younger counterparts, they may consequently have developed an enhanced ability to withstand workplace injury risk [ 21- 24].

Higher levels of C2 and Prkcb (probe 209685_s_at) were associated with a higher lifetime death hazard in males (HR = 1.93 and 5.22, respectively) than in females (HR = 1.30 and 1.31, respectively) and the profile of the latter gene has been observed in colon cancer cell lines [ 67].

We calculated age-specific incidence rates for the 25% lifetime risk cohort by increasing the age-dependent hazard rates for the general population (13% lifetime risk) by a factor independent of age.

Table 2 shows the hazard ratios for men and women for the cardiovascular lifetime risk model.

In terms of risk assessment, the de minimis risk for increased mortality is that level at or below which involuntary risk is generally of no regulatory concern (typically a 10−6 lifetime risk) and the de manifestis risk is that level at or above which involuntary hazards are invariably of regulatory concern (typically a 3.10−4 lifetime risk) [46].

Upper-bound excess lifetime cancer risk and noncarcinogenic hazards are the risk measures, the spatial distribution of which is calculated and mapped on the involved territory, once all the pathways and receptors of the study area are identified.

For both, lifetime and overall hazard, the number of observed high and low individuals was 100, and the number of predicted high and low individuals was 97 and 103, respectively.

This process enables the ranking of air pollutants based on lifetime excess cancer risk or non-cancer hazard indices in each census tract.