Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
The average lifetime dose of diagnostic radiation has increased sevenfold since 1980, driven in part by the increasing popularity of CT scans.
The average lifetime dose of diagnostic radiation has increased sevenfold since 1980, largely because of the rising number of CT scans.
Much of the hearing focused on CT scans, which are largely responsible for a sevenfold increase since 1980 in the average lifetime dose of diagnostic radiation.
The average lifetime dose of diagnostic radiation has increased sevenfold since 1980, and more than half of all cancer patients receive radiation therapy.
The average lifetime dose of diagnostic radiation — excluding therapeutic radiation — has increased sevenfold since 1980, prompting widespread concerns that certain procedures are overused and that they needlessly expose patients to an increased risk of cancer.
Scientists currently predict that a roundtrip to Mars exposes a male astronaut to a lifetime's worth of radiation; female astronauts experience double what's considered a safe lifetime dose.
To address less-than-lifetime exposure to mutagenic impurities in pharmaceuticals, an approach is applied in which the acceptable cumulative lifetime dose (1.5 μg/day × 25,550 days = 38.3 mg) is uniformly distributed over the total number of exposure days during less-than-lifetime exposure.
A population-based case control study with incident cases of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) demonstrated that the use of a high cumulative lifetime dose (3rd tertile) of analgesics up to five years before dialysis was not associated with ESRD [43].
Doxorubicin is one of the most effective anti-cancer drugs but its use is limited by cumulative cardiotoxicity that restricts lifetime dose.
Doxorubicin (DOX), is one of the most widely used anticancer drugs for solid tumours, but its use is compromised by lifetime dose related cardiotoxicity [1].
The lifetime dose was 1.5 × 10(m/s)hd.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com