Sentence examples for life were evaluated from inspiring English sources

Friction and wear life were evaluated by stainless steel and ceramic silicon nitride balls, respectively.

Functional outcome was measured by the range of motion and the Liverpool elbow score (LES), whereas pain and quality of life were evaluated using the visual analogue scale and the SF-36 questionnaire, respectively.

Based on socioemotional selectivity theory, a lifespan approach to expectancy theory, and research on interest and workplace curiosity, two views on motivational change over the trajectory of a working life were evaluated: the view of age-related motivational decline and the view of age-related motivational maintenance.

Nutritional condition and quality of life were evaluated.

Variables concerning quality of treatment and quality of life were evaluated using a standardized questionnaire.

Sensory mechanical thresholds and the participants' self-reported outcome measures of pain and quality of life were evaluated.

Quality of life was evaluated using MIDAS questionnaires.

Sex, age, dialysis status, and quality of life are evaluated as moderating factors.

The quality of life was evaluated via a 100-ary scale (from 0 = not satisfied to 100 = completely satisfied).

For this purpose, parametric study with and without escalation rates for a period of 35 years plant life was evaluated.

Influence of strain rate, temperature, strain range, hold time and hold duration on fatigue life is evaluated.