To read: Jonathan Chait writes in New York about liberal news, media, and Hollywood: Two decades ago, conservative anger against popular culture burned so intensely that it seemed at the time that Hollywood had come to fill the space in the right-wing fear center vacated by the end of Communism.
But in the end, of course, MSNBC responded to Fox News by becoming a decidedly liberal news network instead, using the form that Ailes pioneered (anchors with strong opinions) to reject the politics that he championed.
Iran's outgoing conservative Parliament passed new measures today to rein in the liberal news media, whose influence is increasing.
You contrast the "earnest" endeavors of the rabbinical students at Yeshivat Chovevei Torah with "teenage girls" who "giggle in the lobby" of Abraham Joshua Heschel High School, where the yeshiva is temporarily housed ("A Challenge to an Orthodox Bastion: New Rabbinical School Sees Itself as More Liberal," news article, April 19).
The new age of the Internet affords conservatives many new outlets to organize and inform grassroots supporters outside of the dying liberal news media--both print and TV.
They could have been published on a liberal news site.
As the crowd pushed and shoved, people whose identities aren't entirely clear attacked two photographers from liberal news organizations.
(The most liberal news commentator, Jack Newfield, has been the least likely to mention the first lady).
The liberal news media have been found guilty — by the conservative news media — of coddling Major Hasan's religion, Islam.
We're seeing headlines from both conservative and liberal news sources, seemingly confused by Trump's popularity and polling numbers.
Rather than working to create a slightly more liberal news (read propaganda) source, Democrats should work on grass-roots organizing.
