liable to audit

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "liable to audit" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to financial or compliance matters, indicating that an entity or individual is subject to an audit. Example: "Due to discrepancies in the financial reports, the company is now liable to audit by the regulatory authorities."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

But Wheeler wanted to audit the books.

The New Yorker

Nobody wanted to audit the Fed then.

Forbes

Accountability Office to audit the Fed.

Forbes

Under the plans, trade unions will have to "visibly demonstrate" each year that their membership records are up to date and be liable to an independent audit if discrepancies are found.

BBC

(38a) In case a taxable person is liable to DST in more than one Member State, the Commission should audit, every three years the DST return filed with the Member State of identification.

European Parliament

"You're liable to kill somebody".

The New Yorker

That's liable to be controversial.

The New York Times

Someone was liable to enter after all.

The New Yorker

They are also liable to change suddenly.

The Economist

Inclined hangers are more liable to fatigue.

Engineering Structures

Electronics have become less liable to explode.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "liable to audit", ensure the context clearly establishes the reason or criteria for the audit. Specifying the governing body or regulation that mandates the audit enhances clarity and authority.

Common error

Avoid using "liable to audit" when "subject to audit" or "auditable" is more appropriate. "Liable" often implies a potential negative consequence or legal responsibility, so ensure that this connotation is intended in your context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "liable to audit" functions as a descriptive phrase, indicating a state of being subject to a formal examination or review. The examples, according to Ludwig, confirm its usage in contexts related to accountability and compliance.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Formal & Business

0%

News & Media

0%

Science

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "liable to audit" signifies a state of being subject to an audit, often implying a legal or regulatory requirement. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this expression is grammatically correct and usable in formal writing. While its frequency is currently missing, alternative phrases such as "subject to audit" or "open to audit" can be used to convey similar meanings. When using "liable to audit", it's crucial to ensure the context clearly explains the reasons for the audit and the involved regulatory bodies. This ensures precise and authoritative communication in business, legal, and regulatory contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

subject to audit

Direct synonym, focusing on the state of being under the purview of an audit.

open to audit

Emphasizes accessibility and transparency regarding the audit process.

required to be audited

Highlights the mandatory aspect of undergoing an audit.

must be audited

Stresses the necessity of an audit being performed.

auditable

Describes the characteristic of being able to be audited.

under audit scrutiny

Focuses on the intensive examination aspect of an audit.

exposed to audit

Highlights the vulnerability or risk associated with being audited.

susceptible to audit

Similar to 'exposed', suggesting a potential for audit based on certain conditions.

may be audited

Indicates a possibility or contingency regarding an audit.

potentially audited

Similar to 'may be audited', suggesting a possible future audit.

FAQs

What does "liable to audit" mean?

The phrase "liable to audit" means that something or someone is subject to being examined or reviewed for accuracy and compliance, typically in financial or operational contexts.

What is a good alternative to "liable to audit"?

A suitable alternative to "liable to audit" is "subject to audit", which conveys a similar meaning without the connotation of potential negative consequences.

How does "liable to audit" differ from "auditable"?

"Liable to audit" implies an obligation or susceptibility to be audited, whereas "auditable" describes the characteristic of something being suitable or capable of being audited. The former focuses on the process being applied, while the latter describes the entity's state.

Is there a legal implication when something is described as "liable to audit"?

Yes, "liable to audit" often implies a legal or regulatory requirement to undergo an audit, especially in financial or compliance contexts. Failing to comply with this requirement can lead to penalties or legal repercussions.