liable for termination

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "liable for termination" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to employment, contracts, or agreements where a party may face termination due to certain actions or conditions. Example: "Employees who fail to meet performance standards may be liable for termination after a review period."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Siemens's sluggish reaction to investigations in Liechtenstein triggered a letter last month from TI warning that the firm's membership would be liable for termination after December 15th.In this section After Sakhalin A different route Too little, too late?

The Economist

Scott Pace, a former associate administrator for program analysis and evaluation at NASA and now director of the Space Policy Institute at George Washington University, said, "In a brief check with people more knowledgeable than me, NASA has never held contractors' liable for termination liability".

The New York Times - Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Should the deal fall apart because of antitrust concerns, neither company will be liable for a termination fee, executives said on the analyst call.

The New York Times

The IRS has also warned in its rulings that if the donor is found to have shortchanged the charity, he could be liable for a "termination tax" requiring him to give back all the income tax benefits he originally received.

Forbes

Under the terms of the deal, Blackstone is liable for a $50 million termination fee, payable to PHH.

The New York Times

That would leave Apax liable for only the reverse termination fee instead of the larger loss for completing the deal.

The New York Times

Even worse, because the data package is tied to a contract, the XYBoard owner is liable for a costly early termination fee if they decide to cancel the data package early.

TechCrunch

Doctors found to have assisted with a termination would also be liable for prosecution and a prison term.

The Guardian

Has Sarah Connor finally been targeted for termination?

The Guardian

The barrier also listens for termination signals.

Complex & Intelligent Systems

Arrange for termination details.

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "liable for termination", ensure the context clearly states the conditions or actions that could lead to termination. This provides transparency and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "liable for termination" loosely. It should only be applied when there are specific, justifiable reasons for termination based on pre-defined agreements or policies, not based on arbitrary decisions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "liable for termination" functions as an adjective phrase indicating a state of being at risk of or subject to termination. It is used to denote a potential consequence for actions or circumstances, as Ludwig AI highlights, establishing a link between certain conditions and the possibility of termination.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "liable for termination" is a grammatically sound and usable expression, as Ludwig AI confirms, primarily functioning to denote a state of being at risk of termination due to specific actions or conditions. Although relatively rare in occurrence, it is most frequently found in News & Media, Formal & Business, and Science contexts, indicating a professional or formal register. When using this phrase, ensure clarity in the conditions that lead to potential termination to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "subject to termination" or "at risk of termination" can also be considered based on the desired nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Subject to termination

Emphasizes the conditionality of the termination, similar to 'liable'.

At risk of termination

Highlights the potential negative outcome of termination.

May face termination

Suggests a possibility of termination as a consequence.

Exposed to termination

Implies vulnerability to termination.

Open to termination

Indicates a susceptibility to termination.

Termination is possible

Directly states the possibility of termination.

Termination can occur

Highlights the event of termination.

Termination might ensue

Suggests termination as a likely consequence.

Risking termination

Emphasizes the action that leads to the potential termination.

Under threat of termination

Highlights the imminence and negative aspect of termination.

FAQs

How is "liable for termination" typically used in a legal context?

In legal contexts, "liable for termination" often refers to contractual breaches or violations of company policy that provide grounds for ending an agreement or employment. For example, an employee may be "subject to termination" if they repeatedly violate company rules.

What are some alternatives to saying "liable for termination"?

Depending on the nuance you want to convey, you can use phrases such as "subject to termination", "at risk of termination", or "may face termination". Each of these carries a slightly different implication about the likelihood or imminence of termination.

What's the difference between "liable for termination" and "eligible for termination"?

"Liable for termination" implies responsibility or fault leading to potential termination, while "eligible for termination" suggests meeting certain criteria or qualifications that allow for termination, often in a neutral or even positive sense (e.g., eligibility for early retirement termination benefits).

In what situations might someone be "liable for termination"?

Someone might be "liable for termination" due to various reasons, including poor performance, violation of company policies, breach of contract, or misconduct. The specific reasons should be clearly outlined in employment agreements or company handbooks.