Exact(1)
In the group consuming argan oil, these results of the LF reflected the more synergetic effect of the consumption and the application of argan oil; while in the group consuming olive oil, the results of the LF were due only to the effect of argan oil application, since the consumption of olive oil made no statistically significant improvement on RF.
Similar(59)
Nonetheless, we have included this analysis along with the HF measures for those who accept that LF/HF or normalized LF reflects SNSA.
LF reflects the influence of sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous activity on heart rate fluctuation, and has relevance to vessel baroreflex effects.
Some studies consider LF, when expressed in normalized units, to be a marker of sympathetic modulations, and other studies regard LF as reflecting both sympathetic and vagal activity.
These microscopic fluctuations induced by the external perturbation are at the origin of the local-field effects (LF) and reflect the spatial anisotropy of the material.
LF power reflects sympathetic and parasympathetic modulation of the heart, whereas HF power primarily reflects parasympathetic modulation of the heart [ 25].
The LF component reflects the sympathetic (and vagal) activity, whereas the HF component along with the rMSSD and pNN50 measures in time domain reflects vagal activity in heart rate modulation.
Alternatively, Goldstein and colleagues (Goldstein et al. 2011; Rahman et al. 2011) suggest LF power reflects baroreflex function and cardiac autonomic modulation by these sensory neurones (Rahman et al. 2011).
Systematic adaptation and tailoring of items was performed on the original International Physical Activity Questionnaire long form (IPAQ-LF) to reflect common physical activity (PA) behaviours of adults in Nigeria.
A strength of this study is the systematic adaptation and tailoring of items on the IPAQ-LF to reflect the common PA behaviours of people in Nigeria.
Notably, as in Experiment 1, this change in LF shared feature performance reflected an above-baseline improvement for subjects who slept — the Nap group performed better on LF shared features after the nap than before (t = 2.888, p = 0.006).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com