Sentence examples for lf comparison from inspiring English sources

Although there are specific differences, there are global similarities between the transcriptional profiles of the iron replete vs. deplete data, and the Hb vs. Lf comparison, and the Hb vs. Tf comparison.

Many of the surface adaptive adhesins that differed in the Hb vs. Lf comparison are not seen in the combined analysis because the Lf and Tf phenotypes are more similar to each other, perhaps due to the form of iron acquired, and thus are not seen in both comparison.

In addition, in both groups, the results of the LF comparison showed a statistically significant improvement in skin elasticity after the 60 days of oils treatment.

A further three of the 23 genes (NMB0120, mafB, NMB1746) were up-regulated in the Hb-Tf comparison but not the Hb-Lf comparison.

Twenty-three genes were significantly up-regulated in the presence of Hb compared to ferric chloride, which is considerably fewer than the 82 and 51 genes up-regulated in the presence of Hb in the Hb-Tf and Hb-Lf comparisons, respectively.

Samples of LF used for comparison were purchased from List Biological Laboratories (Campbell, CA).

Sereno et al. [ 14] reported higher EEG amplitudes for LF words in comparison to HF words in anterior parietal and occipital regions between 132 and 164 ms. Assadollahi and Pulvermüller [ 15, 16] found in an MEG study that LF words led to stronger brain responses than HF words starting as early as 120 ms post stimulus.

In addition, there are no solid data to support any benefit from LF-AmB in comparison to AmB-d if administered with correct pre-medication.

Comparisons of LF values by hall show a significant link between hall mean LF and hall width.

In this section, we show the complexity of the proposed method at the mobile terminal side in comparison with LF-OSDMA.

Table 5 Comparison between lfs and our estimates   [1] [2]   LFS Our estimates Central and Eastern European Countries 832.93 780.03 Central or Southern America 816.22 797.43 Near East and North Africa 728.55 Sub-Saharan Africa Africa 731.42 811.01 East Asia 741.45 781.28 Central Asia 788.53 715.12 Source: Authors' calculations on LFS and ISMU dataset.