Sentence examples for lexical selection from inspiring English sources

Hagoort and coworkers argue that the early interaction of word-form and content information is related to ongoing lexical selection, whereas the later N400 effect is associated to semantic integration of selected candidates.

Here we test whether the cumulative semantic cost requires the assumption of lexical selection by competition.

Together, these findings provide support for the assumption that lexical selection is competitive and that semantic interference effects in the PWI paradigm reflect this competition.

These findings suggest that the cumulative semantic cost arises prior to lexical selection and that the effect arises due to incremental changes to the connection weights between semantic and lexical representations.

There is an ongoing debate on the question whether semantic interference effects in language production reflect competitive processes at the level of lexical selection or whether they reflect a post-lexical bottleneck, occupied in particular by response-relevant distractor words.

In addition, we did not include left posterior inferior frontal gyrus in our model because this region has been suggested to be involved in general lexical selection rather than a region specialized for semantic processing [21].

Looking to Hasan's options for speaker in the textual relation system, the speaker attitude is [neutral]: the text has no obvious lexical selections that would be considered to function as overtly evaluative (Martin & White 2005), except in the paraphrase of the Iraqi president, already a much discredited figure.

All essays were analyzed for complexity, grammatical accuracy, fluency, lexical choice, lexical accuracy and propositional content.

These results support the suggestion that both lexical and motor selection processes are involved in speech production [Tremblay and Small, 2011].

We also saw evidence for the influence of lexical competition and selection on word recognition, as reflected in the initial cohort size effect and cohort drop-out rate effect.

The processing stages are (1) peripheral and binaural processing, (2) primitive grouping, (3) further grouping and speech-specific processing (such as processing of lexical information), (4) selection, and (5) attentional control.