leverage with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "leverage with" is not a proper phrase in English, and is not a correct or usable part of a sentence.
The proper phrase would be "leverage against," which is used to refer to using a certain tool or advantage to gain an advantage over a competitor or in a situation. For example, "We can leverage our lower production costs against our competitors to get a better price in the market."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Granted, international leverage with Iran is limited.

The Guardian - Opinion

New York has no leverage with them".

The New York Times - Sports

"People confused leverage with performance," Dunne told me.

The New Yorker

Washington has limited economic and diplomatic leverage with Damascus.

The New York Times

And it will have additional leverage with Sprint".

The New York Times

"Carriers have very little leverage with Apple now.

The New York Times

And Mr. Romney has even less leverage with them.

The New York Times

But China's leverage with North Korea is being tested.

The Guardian

Russia might also overestimate its leverage with the West.

The New York Times

Without the ability to maintain military pressure, Kissinger had very little leverage with the North Vietnamese.

The New York Times - Books

Speculation about whether he would defect increased his leverage with Republican leaders.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

While "leverage with" is frequently used, consider using more grammatically precise alternatives like "influence over" or "bargaining power with" for improved clarity and correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "with" when "over", "on", or "against" might be more appropriate. For instance, consider whether you mean to exert leverage over someone or against a situation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "leverage with" functions as a noun phrase followed by a preposition, often used to indicate the existence of influence or advantage in a relationship or situation. However, as Ludwig AI points out, the phrase can be considered grammatically incorrect.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

While the phrase "leverage with" is widely used, appearing frequently across news, business, and general media, it's important to acknowledge that Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. This suggests that although common, it may not be the most appropriate choice for formal writing. Alternatives such as "influence over", "bargaining power with", or specifying what you are leveraging against are recommended. Using more precise language enhances clarity and credibility. Despite its frequency, consider the grammatical implications and audience when using "leverage with".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

influence over

Focuses on the ability to affect someone or something, shifting from a resource to a direct impact.

influence upon

Similar to "influence over" but can imply a more indirect or subtle effect.

bargaining power with

Highlights the ability to negotiate effectively, emphasizing a transactional dynamic.

weight with

Emphasizes the importance or credibility that someone's opinion or position carries.

sway over

Emphasizes a persuasive influence, implying a more subtle and indirect approach.

control over

Indicates a direct ability to dictate actions or outcomes, suggesting a higher degree of authority.

impact on

Focuses on the effect caused, rather than the means of influence.

authority over

Denotes a legitimate right to exert influence, often based on position or expertise.

advantage over

Highlights a beneficial position relative to others, focusing on the competitive aspect.

power over

Implies a strong ability to affect events or people, often suggesting a formal or institutional role.

FAQs

Is "leverage with" grammatically correct?

While commonly used, "leverage with" is often considered grammatically incorrect. Alternatives like "influence over" or "bargaining power with" may be more appropriate.

What are some alternatives to "leverage with"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "influence over", "power over", or "advantage over" as substitutes for "leverage with".

How can I use "leverage" correctly in a sentence?

Use "leverage" with prepositions like "over", "on", or "against". For example, "They have leverage over their competitors" or "They are leveraging their strengths against the market challenges".

What's the difference between "leverage with" and "influence over"?

"Leverage with" is often seen as grammatically questionable. "Influence over" is a more accepted and standard way to express the ability to affect someone or something.