Sentence examples for levels of suppression from inspiring English sources

In summary, partially consistent with Hypothesis 3, increasing levels of suppression (suppress > control > accept) led to reduced self-reported emotional response to positive but not negative stimuli.

Further, increasing levels of suppression (suppress > control > accept) would be associated with a less marked physiological response when viewing the distressing video and a faster return to baseline in the 5 min after viewing (Hypothesis 2).

Therefore, increasing levels of suppression (suppress > control > accept group) should be associated with reduced subjective and physiological emotional response to the affective images (Hypothesis 3) and a reduced (negative) change in mood for the week following the experiment (Hypothesis 4).

In terms of immediate emotional consequences, we hypothesised that increasing levels of suppression (suppress > control > accept) would prompt a decrease in subjective negative emotion experience while watching the distressing video and a faster recovery of mood in the 5 min after the video finished (Hypothesis 1).

In terms of subsequent mnemomic consequences, we hypothesised that increasing levels of suppression (suppress > control > accept) would be linked to a reduced frequency and lower distress levels of intrusions about the distressing video content experienced immediately afterwards and in the week following the experiment (Hypothesis 5).

Finally, increasing levels of suppression (suppress > control > accept) would lead to reduced free recall and recognition memory of the distressing video at one week follow-up (cf. Richards & Gross, 1999; Hypothesis 6). 1 Eighty nine community volunteers (49 female) were recruited from the Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (MRC CBSU) volunteer participant panel.

By estimating numbers of CD4+CD25+ cells required to attain a selected level of suppression, we could compare suppressive activity in the different groups of mice.

At both time points this particular gene was suppressed but the level of suppression was more in the 3-dpi sample when compared to the 9-dpi sample.

Our results show that all three alleles suppress bubR1 X NDJ and the level of suppression increases with stronger polo alleles (Table 3).

As Fig. 3B suggests, the level of suppression was independent of the direction of motion.

We will show how the decisions on the control system architecture (sensor and actuator location) impact the achievable level of suppression of oscillations (fundamental limitations of performance).