levels of dangerous

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "levels of dangerous" is not correct in English.
It should be "levels of danger." You can use the corrected phrase when discussing varying degrees of risk or threat associated with a particular situation or activity. Example: "The levels of danger associated with extreme sports can vary significantly depending on the activity."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

19 human-written examples

Levels of dangerous behavior are not addressed on the site, he said.

The New York Times

They monitor levels of dangerous gases, including methane and hydrogen sulfide, and handle chemical and biological agents.

The New York Times

Jackie Ballard, chief executive of the charity, welcomed the tentative evidence that England's high levels of dangerous drinking could finally be coming down.

The Guardian

According to the data, Beijing's average levels of dangerous particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter, or PM2.5, has dropped 15.6%.

The Guardian

Still, he points to several studies that suggest menthol smokers may be exposed to higher levels of dangerous compounds than nonmenthol smokers.

The New York Times

And a recent study by Greenpeace International concluded that Calvin Klein, GAP, Zara, Diesel, and other top apparel brands produce clothes that contain high levels of dangerous chemicals.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

40 human-written examples

Dr. Burns notes that the way much tobacco is cured in the United States increases the level of dangerous compounds called nitrosamines.

The New York Times

The city said that burning trees with an air curtain burner produced a minimal level of dangerous pollutants, and that the pilot burn would undergo constant monitoring.

The New York Times

We've reduced the level of dangerous mercury pollution in our seafood.

Huffington Post

It circulated its study in the form of a media release disguised as a news article, headlining, "Many German kindergartens have three times the level of dangerous chemicals than an average household, posing serious health risks to children".

Huffington Post

Levels of this dangerous pollutant are too high and patently beyond the control of London's governing body.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer using the grammatically correct phrase "levels of danger" or "levels of risk" instead of "levels of dangerous". This ensures clarity and avoids misinterpretations in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "dangerous" directly after "levels of". "Dangerous" is an adjective, and you need a noun to complete the phrase correctly. Instead, use the noun form "danger" or "risk".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "levels of dangerous" functions as a noun phrase intended to describe the degree or extent of something perilous. However, the phrase is grammatically incorrect, as noted by Ludwig AI. A correct alternative would be "levels of danger".

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "levels of dangerous" is commonly used, yet grammatically incorrect. According to Ludwig AI, the correct phrasing should be "levels of danger" or "levels of risk". Despite its prevalence in various contexts like News & Media and Science, writers should avoid using the incorrect phrase in formal writing. Alternatives such as "degrees of danger" or "potential hazards" can be employed to convey similar meanings while maintaining grammatical accuracy. Always prioritize precision in language to effectively communicate the intended message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

degrees of danger

Replaces "levels" with "degrees" and shifts from an adjective to a noun form of "dangerous".

levels of risk

Substitutes "dangerous" with the more common and grammatically correct "risk".

degrees of hazard

Uses "degrees" instead of "levels" and "hazard" in place of "dangerous", offering a slight shift in connotation.

extents of peril

Employs more formal vocabulary, replacing "levels" with "extents" and "dangerous" with "peril".

magnitudes of threat

Replaces "levels" with "magnitudes" and "dangerous" with "threat", changing the tone to be more intense.

varying risks

Simplifies the phrase, focusing on the idea of different levels of risk without explicitly mentioning "levels".

potential hazards

Shifts the focus to the potential for danger rather than the specific levels.

risk factors

Highlights the elements that contribute to danger, rather than the levels themselves.

hazardous conditions

Describes the situations that present danger, changing the focus from levels to the conditions.

dangerous circumstances

Emphasizes the circumstances that create danger, moving away from the concept of varying levels.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say "levels of dangerous"?

The grammatically correct way to express this idea is to use the phrase "levels of danger" or "levels of risk".

Is "levels of dangerous" grammatically correct?

No, "levels of dangerous" is not grammatically correct. You should use a noun after "levels of", such as "danger" or "risk". So, the correct phrases are "levels of danger" or "levels of risk".

When should I use "degrees of danger" instead of "levels of dangerous"?

The phrase "levels of dangerous" is incorrect. "Degrees of danger" is a viable alternative to "levels of danger" or "levels of risk" when emphasizing the intensity or severity of the danger, rather than a measured quantity or stage.

What are some other ways to talk about varying degrees of risk?

Besides using "levels of danger" or "degrees of danger", you could use phrases like "potential hazards", "varying risks", or "risk factors", depending on the specific context.