levels of all

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "levels of all" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express a concept related to various levels or categories, but it lacks clarity and context. Example: "The analysis revealed the levels of all participants' engagement in the project."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Eventually, we'd see improvement in the reading levels of all students.

The New York Times

"Our teenagers are at the bottom of the literacy levels of all the advanced countries.

The Guardian - Books

Dobrindt said that Germany will now retest the CO2 levels of all VW models.

The Guardian - Business

There was one fascinating aspect of the populace, medically speaking: the extremely high hemoglobin levels of all full-time residents.

The New Yorker

Compute safe levels of all samples [39].

Journal of Big Data

Compute safe levels of all cases [39].

Journal of Big Data

High levels of all elements will result in white areas.

Environmental Systems Research

This group has the highest levels of all three capitals.

BBC

It has to be one of the hardest and most complex FPS levels of all time.

TechCrunch

Redox potentials and HOMO/LUMO energy levels of all polymers were characterized by cyclic voltammetry.

Electrochimica Acta

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

He has struggled briefly earlier, but this semi-final fine-tuned his tennis to threatening levels of all-round competence.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to multiple items, ensure clarity by specifying what 'all' encompasses. For example, instead of saying "levels of all", specify "levels of all participants" or "levels of all components".

Common error

Avoid using "levels of all" without clear context, as it may lead to ambiguity. Always specify what 'all' refers to in your sentence to ensure readers understand the scope.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "levels of all" functions as a modifier indicating a measurement or degree across multiple entities. However, as Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is not always grammatically sound and requires careful contextualization to avoid ambiguity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

58%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "levels of all" is frequently encountered, particularly in scientific and news contexts, its grammatical correctness and clarity are often debated. Ludwig AI notes the phrase is incorrect and requires careful contextualization. To enhance clarity, it is crucial to specify what "all" refers to, such as "levels of all participants" or "levels of all three markers". Alternatives like "levels for everyone" or "levels across the board" may offer better precision in certain contexts. When writing, consider the potential for ambiguity and ensure that your phrasing clearly communicates the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

levels for everyone

This alternative focuses on inclusivity, replacing "all" with "everyone" to emphasize a broad scope.

levels for all participants

This specifies the group being referenced, making the phrase more precise and context-dependent.

levels across the board

This idiom means "affecting everyone or everything," providing a more concise and idiomatic way to express a similar idea.

levels in all areas

This option focuses on different domains or fields, offering a broader, less person-centric perspective.

levels for each element

This alternative highlights individual components within a larger set, useful when dealing with varied data.

levels for the entirety

This phrase replaces "all" with "the entirety" to emphasize completeness.

levels for each

This alternative emphasizes an individual, distributive meaning rather than a collective one.

levels universally

This option focuses on widespread application or occurrence, rather than specific groups.

levels in totality

This choice stresses the complete or aggregate measurement, shifting the focus from individual elements.

general levels

This simpler version removes the specification of "all", making it a broader statement about levels in general.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "levels of all" for better clarity?

To improve clarity, specify the group or items you're referring to. For instance, use "levels of all participants" or "levels of all components" to avoid ambiguity.

Is "levels of all" grammatically correct in formal writing?

While frequently used, "levels of all" can be ambiguous. In formal writing, specifying the group or items ensures clarity. Consider alternatives like "levels for everyone" or "levels for all participants".

What's the difference between "levels of all" and "general levels"?

"Levels of all" implies a specific set of items or individuals, while "general levels" refers to a broader, unspecified context. Specifying "all" helps narrow the focus of your statement.

When is it appropriate to use "levels of all" in scientific writing?

In scientific writing, ensure that "levels of all" is followed by a clear description of what 'all' encompasses. For example, "levels of all three markers" provides specific context.