In contrast, active learning induced no significant change in the importance level of label claims with respect to their purchasing decision, as well as in the trustiness to label claims.
Omitting the human IgG block had no effect on the level of labeling.
We observed a low level of labeling throughout the WT retina (Fig. 2D).
Differences in the level of labeling of the two different fluorophores were taken into account while computing the data.
Unfortunately, this level of labeling also skewed viral activity based on luciferase activity and qPCR of viral genomes.
We observed a low level of labeling in the WT retina (Fig. 2G), but a very intense labeling in the Vldlr-/ retina (Fig. 2H).
Injection of higher doses such as ten million cells resulted in a similar level of label uptake by tissue macrophages compared to injecting two million cells.
The level of labeling was determined spectrophotometrically using molar extinction coefficients of 47,000 mol−1 cm−1 at 336 nm for SITS and 11,000 mol−1 cm−1 at 426 nm for LYI.
The low level of labeling seen in B16 and GM95 melanoma may represent the amount of uptake that is mediated by the relatively weak interaction of SBD with POPC, SM and cholesterol alone (see fig. 2, 3).
The slides with DAF-FM-labeled HUVE and HDMVE cells were imaged under fluorescent microscope to confirm localization of fluorescence only inside cells (the level of labeling was >90%, data not shown).
