Sentence examples for level of evidentiary from inspiring English sources

…having one box of adaptation evidence should be considered a "minimal" level of evidentiary breadth.

For example, Schmitt and Pilcher (2004) tentatively propose that: …having one box of adaptation evidence should be considered a "minimal" level of evidentiary breadth.

For example, Schmitt and Pilcher (2004) suggest that within each line of evidence, a "minimal" level of evidentiary depth might be the appropriate ranking for single studies with one mode of measurement, poor methodological control, and unrepresentative sampling.

Eighteen additional data elements with a lesser level of evidentiary support were included in the recommended data set.

11 Despite achieving the highest level of evidentiary support for use in ED patients with chest pain the modified Goldman m-Goldmann) risk score remains untested as a discharge tool in combination with a single presentation hs-cTn.

"Moderate" levels of evidentiary depth might be the appropriate ranking for at least two studies with more than one mode of measurement, good levels of control, and good sampling techniques, while "'extensive" levels of evidentiary depth might be the appropriate ranking for numerous studies with more than two modes of measurement, high levels of control, and high sampling quality.

Finally, "exemplary" levels of evidentiary depth might be the appropriate ranking for lines of evidence with dozens of studies with multiple modes of measurement, the highest levels of control, and true representative sampling.

Ideally, it could be studied in a clinical trial or, alternatively, using a model which synthesises the evidence from all available sources and levels of evidentiary quality [ 19, 20].

Here, we offer a variety of strategies from both behavioural sciences and medicine that have been developed in recent years, which vary from experimental studies to simple observations to opinions, with varying levels of evidentiary support.

One of the most popular and effective methods for determining appropriate rulesets adopts two key principles: (1) identifying key protocols and services that are used on a network and (2) determining the level of granularity required for your evidentiary logs.

Whilst the Level 2 case studies report change and present higher levels of analysis, the evidentiary value on the effectiveness of IHPs is limited and attribution of change unproven.