"level of confirmation" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to the degree to which something is confirmed or verified, such as a fact or an opinion. For example, "We need to establish a higher level of confirmation before we make any decisions."
Disney's Twitter account for the "Newsies" production, as well as Mr. Jordan, sent out messages on Monday night highlighting these remarks, indicating a level of confirmation.
Humans are better able to rationally process information, giving equal weight to multiple viewpoints, if they are emotionally distant from the issue (although a low level of confirmation bias can still occur when an individual has no vested interests).
While the idea that the N.S.A. is tapping transatlantic cables is hardly shocking — there have been excellent recent stories on the subject in the Washington Post and The Atlantic — as far as I'm aware, Alexander and Hayden's remarks last week represent the highest level of confirmation of the practice, and they help to explain Greenwald's report on the N.S.A.'s interest in Brazil.
The purpose of this study is to design a prospective clinical trial in which we hope to achieve the highest level of confirmation in identifying and making treatment recommendations for subgroups, when the risk levels in the control arm can be ordered.
Since papers were selected at random with respect to all factors, the proportion of positive results in this sample is a proxy of the level of confirmation bias.
We sorted the set of protein pairs collected by Arifuzzaman using APPIA score as a measure of the likelihood of a functional association, and compared the level of confirmation for the 'n' best scoring pairs with the level obtained for the whole Arifuzzaman data set and for those pairs predicted for the whole proteome (Fig. 4).
We are learning more, in light of the 2016 presidential election, of the existence of filter bubbles, which encourage unprecedented levels of confirmation bias, both in social media and search.
Rather, confirmationism was mainly challenged on conceptual, ahistorical grounds, such as its inability to generate plausible yet non-arbitrary levels of confirmation for moderately sized samples, the difficulties encountered in devising a suitable criterion for evidential relevance, and so on.
Second, stratification according to levels of confirmation of DES exposure did not result in different conclusions (Table 4), whereas more uncertainty about DES exposure might have led to more bias to the null.
In addition the inverse correlation between IL-8 and ERα expression could provide a level of diagnostic confirmation.
For the first decades of follow-up (1950 1970), there was also a greater possibility of case underascertainment and a lower level of diagnostic confirmation.
