Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
level of conclusions
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "level of conclusions" is not commonly used in written English and may be unclear in meaning.
It could be used when discussing the depth or degree of conclusions drawn from a particular analysis or study. Example: "The level of conclusions drawn from the research indicates a significant correlation between the variables studied."
Science
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
Data integration can be done at the level of conclusions about responsive genes and phenotypes, and this workflow is supported by CEBS.
Even the selection of 47 representative species (given thousands available genomes) is not clearly justified, and, to make things worse, may introduce some biases at the level of conclusions.
Science
We are only interested in changes at the level of conclusions made for management application, i.e. whether there are hypothetical scenarios which could falsify the management decision just derived from the model results.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
Although we did not include the following as explicitly in our manuscript, we would like to point out that what might seem as minor technical differences between our and the Anisimov et al. (2015) study, can have severe implications for the study species and thus on the levels of conclusions that can be drawn (please also see the response to the first concern raised by Reviewer 1).
Science
To our knowledge, CERHR was the only resource of its kind, producing evaluations that considered toxicity findings in the context of current human exposures to derive "level-of-concern" conclusions.
Hazard identification conclusions are reached by integrating the highest level-of-evidence conclusion for a health effect(s) from the human and the animal evidence streams.
If the human level-of-evidence conclusion of no health effect is supported by animal evidence of no health effect, the hazard identification conclusion is "not identified".
When the data provide evidence of no health effect, the level-of-evidence conclusion for human data from step 6 is considered together with the level-of-evidence for health effects conclusion for nonhuman animal data.
When the data support a health effect, the level-of-evidence conclusion for human data from step 6 ("high," "moderate," or "low") is considered together with the level of evidence for nonhuman animal data to reach one of four hazard identification conclusions.
There is thus some convergence at the level of practical conclusions between their understanding of the immunity of civilians or common citizens and the "moral disaster" position outlined above (2.3.2).
Science
If the process had been done independently for each vessel, the significance level of the conclusions would have been inflated.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "level of conclusions", consider whether more specific terms like "depth", "scope", or "certainty" might provide clearer and more precise meaning in your writing. For example, instead of "the level of conclusions was high", try "the depth of the conclusions was significant".
Common error
Avoid using "level of conclusions" as a generic placeholder for more precise descriptors. Instead, clarify what aspect of the conclusions you're addressing: their certainty, depth, scope, or impact. Vague language dilutes your message and weakens the impact of your findings.
Source & Trust
78%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "level of conclusions" functions as a noun phrase, typically acting as an object or complement in a sentence. It denotes a degree or measure applied to the insights or judgments derived from an analysis or investigation. Ludwig indicates this phrase is acceptable but not commonly used, suggesting clearer alternatives may exist.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "level of conclusions" is an acceptable but infrequently used phrase that refers to the depth, scope, or certainty of findings. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is acceptable, but not frequently used and can often be replaced with more specific alternatives like "depth of analysis" or "strength of evidence" for enhanced clarity. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, it's crucial to ensure the phrase is used precisely to reflect the intended meaning, avoiding vagueness. By considering context-specific alternatives, writers can improve the impact and clarity of their communication.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
degree of certainty in the findings
Focuses on the confidence associated with the research outcomes.
depth of the inferences
Emphasizes the extent to which inferences are explored and understood.
extent of the findings
Highlights the breadth and reach of the derived results.
scope of the deductions
Indicates the range of implications derived from the evidence.
generality of the results
Concentrates on how broadly the results can be applied.
strength of the evidence-based statements
Underscores the power and reliability of conclusions drawn directly from evidence.
reliability of the derived statements
Highlights the dependability and trustworthiness of stated results.
confidence level in the judgements
Stresses the degree of assurance in professional judgements.
the depth of understanding
Indicates comprehension scope or profundity.
the breadth of understanding
Indicates comprehension extent or scope.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "level of conclusions" for better clarity?
Consider using more specific terms such as "depth of analysis", "scope of findings", or "degree of certainty" depending on the intended meaning. These alternatives can provide a more precise and understandable message.
What does "level of conclusions" mean in academic writing?
In academic writing, "level of conclusions" typically refers to the depth, breadth, or certainty of the results and interpretations derived from research or analysis. It indicates how robust or far-reaching the conclusions are.
Is there a difference between "level of conclusions" and "strength of conclusions"?
Yes, while related, "strength of conclusions" emphasizes the robustness and evidentiary support behind the conclusions, "level of conclusions" implies a broader assessment of their depth, scope, or generality. Use "strength of conclusions" when emphasizing the reliability and validity of findings.
How to determine an appropriate "level of conclusions" in a research paper?
The appropriate "level of conclusions" should be proportional to the evidence and analysis presented in the paper. Avoid overstating or generalizing beyond what the data supports. Ensure your conclusions are well-justified and clearly articulated.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
78%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested