level of arts

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "level of arts" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to refer to the quality or standard of artistic work, but it is not a commonly used expression. Example: "The level of arts in this exhibition is truly impressive, showcasing a variety of styles and techniques."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The framework could also be enhanced by identifying additional subthemes and determining if a threshold level of arts engagement (eg, hours per week) is needed before outcomes start to accrue, and once initiated, the manner in which outcomes are produced (eg, slowly, quickly, does this change with time).

BMJ Open

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Have his snaps ever attained the level of art?

The New York Times

He helped raise it to the level of art.

The New York Times

"He elevated the song to the level of art".

The New York Times

CAN fashion rise to the level of art?

The New York Times

On I Wanna Fuck Right Now, she raised sexual confidence to the level of art concept.

The Guardian - Music

The goal was always to provide a level of art otherwise unavailable in minority-based theater.

The New York Times

But in Kingsley Amis's Ending Up, irritation is raised to the level of art.

The Guardian - Books

Shane is the guy who has brought this gunfighting to the level of art".

The New York Times

He says the movie elevates "Yankee 'reborn' bigotry" to the level of art.

The New Yorker

In MOCKEYMEN (Golden Gryphon, $26.95), Ian Watson raises infodumping to the level of art.

The New York Times - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the quality or standard of art, use established phrases like "artistic quality" or "standard of art" instead of "level of arts" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "level of arts" as it is not a standard expression in English. Instead, use more recognized phrases such as "artistic quality" or "standard of art".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "level of arts" is intended to describe the standard or quality within artistic disciplines. However, as Ludwig AI indicates, it's not a standard expression in English. Therefore, it primarily functions as an attempt to quantify or qualify artistic merit, though inaccurately.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "level of arts" might seem intuitive, Ludwig AI highlights its non-standard nature in English. It aims to describe the quality or standard in artistic fields, but lacks grammatical correctness. More accepted alternatives include "artistic quality" or "standard of art". Given the rarity of the phrase and its incorrect grammatical standing, writers should opt for clearer, more conventional language to discuss artistic merit.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

artistic quality

This alternative uses a more standard noun phrase to refer to the quality of art.

standard of art

This option replaces 'level' with 'standard', which is a more conventional term for assessing art.

quality of artistic expression

This phrase emphasizes the quality of how art is expressed, making it more descriptive.

degree of artistic merit

This alternative is more formal and focuses on the merit or value of artistic work.

level of artistry

This changes the focus to the skill and creativity demonstrated in art.

artistic caliber

This phrase uses 'caliber' to denote the quality and ability in artistic endeavors.

extent of artistic skill

This alternative highlights the range and proficiency of skill in art.

artistic achievement

This phrase focuses on the accomplishment and success within art.

depth of artistic understanding

This shifts the focus to the intellectual and emotional understanding conveyed through art.

scope of art

This alternative describes art in terms of breadth and range, making it a more abstract option.

FAQs

How can I correctly refer to the quality of art?

Instead of using the non-standard phrase "level of arts", consider alternatives like "artistic quality", "standard of art", or "quality of artistic expression".

Is it grammatically correct to say "level of arts"?

No, the phrase "level of arts" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use phrases like "artistic quality" or "standard of art".

What's the difference between "level of arts" and "level of artistry"?

"Level of arts" is generally considered incorrect. "Level of artistry" refers to the skill and creative ability demonstrated in artistic work and is a more acceptable phrase, though still less common than "artistic quality".

When should I use "artistic quality" instead of "level of arts"?

Always use ""artistic quality"" or ""standard of art"" as they are the correct and commonly understood ways to refer to the quality of art. Avoid using "level of arts".