Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
At the cellular level, breast cancers can be distinguished based on receptor status that is, being either hormone-receptor positive or hormone-receptor negative.
However, at the histopathological level, breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease, hampering the prognosis predictions.
At the DNA level, breast carcinomas are genetically quite heterogeneous, so there is no universally applicable DNA marker available.
On a higher level, breast cancer datasets collected by different institutions can be considered as resamplings from the underlying breast cancer population.
This study is to investigate the effects of geserelin+tamoxifen (TAM) on estradiol level, breast density (BD), endometrial thickness (ET), and blood lipids in premenopausal and perimenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer.
It can be argued that, to assess the effect of a screening program on a population level, breast cancer mortality in invited women should be compared with that of noninvited women.
Similar(51)
These environmental parameters were characterized by maternal education level, breast-feeding, and the presence of adequate household garbage collection, sewage system, and tap water supply.
These models employed binary variables for use of paint and/or solvents during the period of interest plus a series of potential confounders (household annual income, mother's education level, father's education level, breast-feeding, parental smoking, parental occupational exposure to paint and/or solvents, and parents' age at child's birth).
Evidence is mounting that excessive soy consumption can expose boys to too much estrogen, causing lowered testosterone levels, breast development and other signs of feminization.
(3) State-level breast, cervical, colorectal and prostate cancer screening rates.
CHEK2 has also been reported as an intermediate-level breast cancer risk gene, regardless of family history [ 44, 45].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com