Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
let we have
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "let we have" is not grammatically correct and is not commonly used in written English.
The correct form would be "let us have." This phrase is used to make a suggestion or a request. An example of using it in a sentence could be: "Let us have a moment of silence for those who lost their lives in the tragedy."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(5)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
18 human-written examples
Then, let, we have.
Let, we have and (5.2).
and let We have (2.12).
Indeed, let, we have (3.2).
Let We have and define (2.3).
Setting, and let,, we have (2.13).
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
41 human-written examples
Since, letting, we have.
Letting, we have holds.
Letting, we have that and.
Letting, we have for all.
By letting, we have (2.12).
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use the grammatically correct form "let us have" in formal writing. This ensures clarity and avoids misinterpretation.
Common error
Avoid using "we" directly after "let". The correct pronoun is "us", as "let" functions as a verb requiring an object pronoun.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "let we have" is grammatically incorrect. However, Ludwig identifies occurrences primarily in scientific and technical writing, where it appears to be used to introduce a definition or assumption. Standard English dictates using "let us have".
Frequent in
Science
70%
News & Media
20%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "let we have" appears in some contexts, particularly in scientific literature, it is grammatically incorrect. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the correct form is "let us have". It's best to avoid "let we have" in formal writing and opt for the standard and grammatically sound alternative to ensure clear communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
let us have
This is the grammatically correct form of the phrase, replacing "we" with "us" to function as a command or suggestion.
allow us to have
Replaces "let" with "allow" for a slightly more formal tone.
give us
A more direct and concise way of saying "let us have".
permit us to have
Similar to "allow us to have" but even more formal.
provide us with
Emphasizes the act of supplying or furnishing something.
grant us the ability to have
Expresses the idea of being given permission or capability in a more elaborate way.
enable us to possess
Focuses on providing the means or opportunity to have something.
bestow upon us
A formal way to express the act of granting or conferring something.
accord us
Similar to bestow, indicating a formal granting of something.
leave us with
Implies that "we" will be left with having something.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say "let we have"?
The correct form is "let us have". The pronoun "we" is incorrect in this context; "us" is the appropriate object pronoun.
When should I use "let us have"?
Use "let us have" when making a suggestion, request, or proposal. For example, "Let us have a meeting to discuss the project."
Are there more formal alternatives to "let us have"?
Yes, you can use phrases like "allow us to have" or "permit us to have" in more formal contexts.
Is "let we have" ever acceptable?
No, "let we have" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Always use "let us have".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested