let him bunt

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "let him bunt" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in the context of baseball, referring to allowing a player to attempt a bunt, which is a batting technique. Example: "In this situation, the coach decided to let him bunt to advance the runner on second base."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Just don't let him bunt.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Let's let him respond.

The New York Times

Let him be, let him play.

Independent

"Let him unload".

The New York Times - Sports

Then let him continue.

The New York Times

Let him be dominant".

The New York Times

They let him continue.

The New York Times - Sports

And they let him".

The New York Times

Let him live!

The New Yorker

Let him give them.

The New York Times

They let him watch.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "let him bunt" in baseball writing, ensure the context clearly establishes who is giving the permission or instruction for the bunt. For instance, specify 'the coach decided to "let him bunt"'.

Common error

Avoid using "let him bunt" without a clear understanding of the game situation. Randomly suggesting a bunt can undermine the team's strategic goals. Bunting is frequently used to move a runner from first to second base, but a poor bunt attempt could put the runner out.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "let him bunt" functions as an imperative, specifically a command or permission within the context of baseball. Ludwig AI confirms that it’s usable in written English, and the example demonstrates its use in a baseball-related scenario.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "let him bunt" is a grammatically correct and usable imperative phrase, predominantly found in baseball contexts to indicate permission or instruction for a player to perform a bunt. While relatively rare in broader usage, Ludwig AI confirms that its meaning is clear and its application is strategically focused. When writing about baseball, ensure the context clarifies who is authorizing the bunt and the tactical reason for the decision. Alternatives such as "allow him to bunt" or "instruct him to bunt" can offer nuanced variations, but the core meaning remains consistent.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

allow him to bunt

Replaces "let" with "allow", maintaining the same meaning of granting permission.

permit him to bunt

Substitutes "let" with "permit", providing a more formal synonym for granting permission.

give him the bunt sign

Focuses on the signal given to indicate the player should bunt.

signal him to bunt

Highlights the act of signaling the player to execute a bunt.

authorize him to bunt

Emphasizes the authorization or command to perform a bunt.

tell him to bunt

Directly instructs the player to bunt.

have him bunt

Indicates that the manager wants the player to bunt.

instruct him to bunt

Focuses on the instructional aspect of the bunting decision.

let him try to bunt

Emphasizes giving the player the opportunity to bunt.

allow him the opportunity to bunt

Formal way to say that the player has permission to bunt

FAQs

How to use "let him bunt" in a sentence?

You can use "let him bunt" in sentences like: "The coach decided to "let him bunt" to advance the runner" or "In that situation, it's best to "let him bunt" instead of swinging for the fences".

What does "let him bunt" mean in baseball?

"Let him bunt" means allowing a batter to intentionally tap the ball softly, usually to advance a runner to the next base. It's a strategic move often employed to improve the team's scoring position.

What can I say instead of "let him bunt"?

Alternatives to "let him bunt" include "allow him to bunt", "signal him to bunt", or "instruct him to bunt", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it strategically sound to "let him bunt"?

It’s strategically sound to "let him bunt" when a runner is on first base with no outs, aiming to move the runner into scoring position (second base) for a higher chance of scoring a run. It’s also useful when a fast runner is on base, or when a team needs to score just one run.