Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

lesser errors for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lesser errors for" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts discussing the reduction of minor mistakes or issues in a specific situation, but it is better to clarify the meaning. Example: "The report aims to address lesser errors for improved accuracy in future submissions."

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Results showed lesser errors for fuzzy logic compared to ANN for the training data set.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

There are many other lesser errors in this book as well.

News & Media

Huffington Post

Finally, the voltage vector that yields the lesser error is implemented for the current control.

The scoring from multiple layers results in a lesser error.

Under this assumption, interference cancellation can be performed with lesser error in the successive stages.

Results show that lower order filters and better audiogram matching with lesser matching errors are obtained using Farrow structure.

However, when normalized over the entire, large, dataset, the higher training accuracy error converges to a lesser prediction error.

As one could anticipate, our normalization procedure led to lesser-pronounced error bars, including those for 3h LPS data point.

Science

eLife

Murray error for 15-all, Djokovic error for 15-30.

Look for lesser known airlines for your flight.

The bias and the mean squared error of the naive estimator are always larger than the bias and the mean squared error of the TBE, but to a lesser extent for the parameter β.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing error reduction, consider using more common phrases like "fewer errors in" or "reduced errors in" for clarity and better readability.

Common error

Avoid using "lesser errors for" in contexts where simpler, more direct language would be more effective. Overuse can make your writing sound stilted or unnatural.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

3.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lesser errors for" functions as an adjectival modifier describing the type of errors being considered, followed by a preposition. It indicates that the errors are of a smaller magnitude or significance. The limited examples Ludwig provides suggest it's not a standard or frequently used construction.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Wiki

34%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "lesser errors for" is a rarely used phrase that attempts to specify the reduced severity of errors in a particular context. According to Ludwig, its usage is acceptable but not preferred, as it lacks the clarity and commonality of alternatives like "fewer errors in" or "reduced errors regarding". It finds occasional use in scientific or technical writing. For improved clarity and impact, consider opting for these alternatives in your writing. Ludwig AI flags this phrase as non-standard in written English suggesting using more common alternatives.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "lesser errors for"?

You can use alternatives such as "fewer mistakes in", "reduced errors in", or "minimized errors in" depending on the context.

How can I use "lesser errors for" in a sentence?

While not very common, you might use it in contexts where you want to specify that the errors being considered are of a smaller magnitude or significance compared to others. It's crucial to ensure clarity and context in such instances.

Which is correct, "lesser errors for" or "fewer errors for"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "fewer errors for" is more commonly used and generally preferred for better clarity. However, note that both options are less common than alternatives like "fewer errors in".

Is "lesser errors for" appropriate for formal writing?

Due to its uncommon usage, "lesser errors for" might not be the best choice for formal writing. Opt for clearer and more widely accepted phrases such as "reduced errors in" or "fewer errors in" to maintain professionalism and clarity.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

3.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: