Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
lesser errors for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "lesser errors for" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts discussing the reduction of minor mistakes or issues in a specific situation, but it is better to clarify the meaning. Example: "The report aims to address lesser errors for improved accuracy in future submissions."
Science
News & Media
Wiki
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Results showed lesser errors for fuzzy logic compared to ANN for the training data set.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
There are many other lesser errors in this book as well.
News & Media
Finally, the voltage vector that yields the lesser error is implemented for the current control.
The scoring from multiple layers results in a lesser error.
Under this assumption, interference cancellation can be performed with lesser error in the successive stages.
Results show that lower order filters and better audiogram matching with lesser matching errors are obtained using Farrow structure.
Science
However, when normalized over the entire, large, dataset, the higher training accuracy error converges to a lesser prediction error.
Science
As one could anticipate, our normalization procedure led to lesser-pronounced error bars, including those for 3h LPS data point.
Science
Murray error for 15-all, Djokovic error for 15-30.
News & Media
Look for lesser known airlines for your flight.
Wiki
The bias and the mean squared error of the naive estimator are always larger than the bias and the mean squared error of the TBE, but to a lesser extent for the parameter β.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When discussing error reduction, consider using more common phrases like "fewer errors in" or "reduced errors in" for clarity and better readability.
Common error
Avoid using "lesser errors for" in contexts where simpler, more direct language would be more effective. Overuse can make your writing sound stilted or unnatural.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "lesser errors for" functions as an adjectival modifier describing the type of errors being considered, followed by a preposition. It indicates that the errors are of a smaller magnitude or significance. The limited examples Ludwig provides suggest it's not a standard or frequently used construction.
Frequent in
Science
33%
News & Media
33%
Wiki
34%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "lesser errors for" is a rarely used phrase that attempts to specify the reduced severity of errors in a particular context. According to Ludwig, its usage is acceptable but not preferred, as it lacks the clarity and commonality of alternatives like "fewer errors in" or "reduced errors regarding". It finds occasional use in scientific or technical writing. For improved clarity and impact, consider opting for these alternatives in your writing. Ludwig AI flags this phrase as non-standard in written English suggesting using more common alternatives.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
fewer mistakes in
Focuses on reducing the number of mistakes, changing the adjective and preposition.
reduced errors in
Emphasizes the act of error reduction, using a past participle as an adjective.
decreased errors in
Directly indicates a reduction in the quantity of errors.
mitigated errors in
Highlights the lessening of the impact of errors, implying a more formal or technical context.
minimized errors in
Focuses on reducing errors to the smallest possible amount.
less errors concerning
Changes the preposition while keeping the focus on a smaller quantity of errors.
smaller number of errors in
Emphasizes the quantity of errors and uses a more descriptive approach.
fewer errors regarding
Alters both the adjective and the preposition to express a similar concept.
lower incidence of errors in
Shifts the focus to the rate at which errors occur, rather than their simple existence.
less significant errors for
Emphasizes the impact of errors instead of the quantity.
FAQs
What are some alternatives to "lesser errors for"?
You can use alternatives such as "fewer mistakes in", "reduced errors in", or "minimized errors in" depending on the context.
How can I use "lesser errors for" in a sentence?
While not very common, you might use it in contexts where you want to specify that the errors being considered are of a smaller magnitude or significance compared to others. It's crucial to ensure clarity and context in such instances.
Which is correct, "lesser errors for" or "fewer errors for"?
Both are grammatically correct, but "fewer errors for" is more commonly used and generally preferred for better clarity. However, note that both options are less common than alternatives like "fewer errors in".
Is "lesser errors for" appropriate for formal writing?
Due to its uncommon usage, "lesser errors for" might not be the best choice for formal writing. Opt for clearer and more widely accepted phrases such as "reduced errors in" or "fewer errors in" to maintain professionalism and clarity.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested