less water for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less water for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a reduction in the amount of water allocated or needed for a specific purpose or activity. Example: "Due to the drought, we will need to find ways to use less water for irrigation this season."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

44 human-written examples

Less ice means less water for farming and producing electricity.

Columbia University

There's less water for agriculture and less water for all the new lodges that are getting built".

The Guardian

But we are also tending to eat less food and use less water, for example.

The Guardian

Also, birds need less water for their bodily processes than mammals.

The New York Times - Science

For example, blueberry growers might be required to draw less water for irrigation.

The New York Times

Around the world, vanishing glaciers will mean less water for people and crops in the future.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

16 human-written examples

Cypriot farmers, for instance, are being urged to pump less water from aquifers for irrigation.

BBC

Drought impact was obvious on infection rates when there was less water available for drinking and for personal hygiene.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

That's a notable but not prohibitive difference, especially given that there's less and less water available for import.

The New Yorker

It concluded: "All of the scenarios predicted a future with less water available for people, businesses and the environment.

The Guardian

Part of the problem is that there are more of us who need to drink clean water, making less water available for sanitation systems.

Stanford University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the impact of climate change, use "less water for" to emphasize the consequences on agriculture, drinking water, and ecosystems.

Common error

Avoid using "less water for" without specifying the affected sector or purpose. Always provide context to clarify who or what is experiencing the water shortage to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify "less water for irrigation" instead of just "less water."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less water for" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase indicating a decrease in the availability of water for a specific purpose or entity. This is supported by Ludwig and the numerous examples provided.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

62%

Academia

18%

Wiki

9%

Less common in

Science

7%

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "less water for" is a common and grammatically correct way to express a reduction in water availability for a specific purpose, such as agriculture, drinking, or sanitation. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is used across various contexts, particularly in news, academia, and general discussions about climate change and resource management. While the phrase is generally neutral, it often carries an undertone of concern regarding the consequences of water scarcity. When using this phrase, ensure you provide sufficient context to specify the affected sector or purpose to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reduced water allocation for

Focuses on the deliberate reduction in the amount of water assigned for a specific use.

decreased water supply for

Emphasizes the diminished availability of water from a source for a particular recipient.

lower water availability for

Highlights the reduced accessibility of water for a given purpose or entity.

scarcer water resources for

Indicates a decline in the abundance of water resources available for a specific use.

diminished water access for

Focuses on the impaired ability to obtain water for a specific need or purpose.

limited water provision for

Highlights the constrained supply of water for a particular use or entity.

restricted water use for

Emphasizes the limitations placed on the utilization of water for a specific purpose.

insufficient water for

Indicates that there is not enough water to satisfy the needs of something.

reduced water volume for

Focuses on the diminished quantity of water available for a particular purpose.

smaller water quantity for

Highlights the reduced amount of water available for a specific application.

FAQs

How can I use "less water for" in a sentence?

You can use "less water for" to describe a reduction in water allocation, supply, or availability. For example, "Melting glaciers mean "less water for crops" in the future" or "There's "less water for agriculture"."

What are some alternatives to "less water for"?

Alternatives include "reduced water allocation for", "decreased water supply for", or "lower water availability for", depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "fewer water for" instead of "less water for"?

No, use "less water for". "Less" is used with uncountable nouns like water, while "fewer" is used with countable nouns.

What does it mean when sources mention "less water for irrigation"?

It means there is a reduction in the amount of water available for agricultural purposes, which can impact crop yields and food production.