less time for

USAGE SUMMARY

"less time for" is a grammatically correct phrase and can be used in written English.
It means having a decreased amount of time available for something. It can be used in various contexts, such as work, leisure, or personal responsibilities. Example 1: "I've been so busy with my new job that I have less time for my hobbies." Example 2: "As I get older, I have less time for drama and prefer to surround myself with positive people." Example 3: "Due to the traffic jam, we have less time for sightseeing than we originally planned." Example 4: "With the added responsibilities of being a parent, I have less time for myself, but I wouldn't trade it for anything."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I have much less time for solitude.

The New York Times

That left less time for development.

The Economist

You have much less time for reading".

The Guardian - Lifestyle

"There's a lot less time for me.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

"I have less and less time for hobbies," he said.

The New York Times

"And more competition means less time for alcohol.

The New York Times - Travel

He had less and less time for speeches.

The New York Times

"This job leaves you less time for reporting," King says.

The New Yorker

That's society changing … People have less time for each other.

The Guardian

But companies have less and less time for them.

Harvard Business Review

It's less time for me in the summer, honestly.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less time for", ensure the context clearly states what the time is being taken away from. For example, specify "less time for leisure activities" instead of just "less time".

Common error

Avoid using "less time for" when you mean "no time for". "Less time" implies some time is still available, whereas "no time" indicates a complete lack of availability.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less time for" primarily functions as a modifier indicating a reduction in the amount of time available for a specific activity or purpose. As Ludwig suggests, this is a common construction used to express constraints on one's schedule or resources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Formal & Business

20%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Science

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "less time for" is a grammatically sound phrase indicating a reduction in available time for a specific activity. It's widely used across various contexts, from news and media to business and personal communication. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage, highlighting that the phrase effectively conveys constraints on time. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying what activity or purpose is being affected. While seemingly simple, mastering nuances like this is key to effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reduced time for

Indicates that the time available has been decreased.

decreased time for

Emphasizes a reduction in the time allotted.

limited time for

Highlights that time is finite and restricted.

scarce time for

Suggests that time is in short supply.

insufficient time for

Implies that there isn't enough time to dedicate to something.

a shortage of time for

Indicates a deficit in the amount of time available.

a lack of time for

Highlights the absence of sufficient time.

time constraints for

Focuses on the limitations placed on time.

competing priorities

Describes a situation where different demands reduce time available.

busier schedule

Implies a lifestyle or workload that doesn't allow for adequate time.

FAQs

How can I use "less time for" in a sentence?

You can use "less time for" to indicate a reduction in the amount of time available for something, for example, "I have "less time for hobbies" now that I'm working full-time."

What are some alternatives to saying "less time for"?

Alternatives include "reduced time for", "limited time for", or "insufficient time for", depending on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "less time for"?

Yes, "less time for" is grammatically correct and commonly used to express a decrease in available time.

What's the difference between "less time for" and "no time for"?

"Less time for" implies that some time is still available, even if it's reduced. "No time for", on the other hand, indicates that there is absolutely no time available at all.