'less significant difference' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when the difference between two things is not very great, or if you want to make a contrast between a great difference and a lesser one. For example, you could say, "There was a great difference in the number of votes between the two candidates, but a less significant difference in their political views."
Statistically, a less significant difference was observed with monoculture's fermentation when compared with co-culture [58].
In comparison with voxel-level FWE, cluster-level FWE controls for false-positive results and achieves pcorr<0.05 by simultaneously requiring a less significant difference in activation at each individual voxel (puncorr.<0.005), but also requiring a simulation-determined minimum number of contiguous activated voxels in each cluster.
The expression of TrCel5A with a KDEL peptide for retention in the ER (TrCel5AER) resulted in a less significant difference in growth and development.
Statistical analysis of the differences across all testing conditions was established using analysis of variance (ANOVA) of one factor and less significant difference post hoc tests.
In contrast to these results, the group with GO shows less significant difference of CEB in comparison with controls (P < 0.01) and no difference between GO and MO, LP.
A relation between the two would explain the slight, less significant difference in lifespan at 20°, when only ∼20% of the mir-83 (n4638 ); mir-34 (gk437 ) population is migration defective, vs. the significant difference in lifespan when animals undergo temperature changes, as now ∼60% of the population is migration defective.
In the variances (F Test) less significant differences are found.
While there are less significant differences between groups in Table 2 than in Table 1, we can still see some disparities between groups.
Less significant differences were detected in the spleen on days 2 and 8 post-challenge.
The other 4 subgroups exhibited less significant differences and were combined into a single intermediate subgroup (Fig. 2D).
It should be realized that the power of this single-subject analysis is somewhat lower than the analyses for the novices, resulting in less significant differences in the post-hoc tests.
