less share of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less share of" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to express a smaller portion or amount of something. Example: "The company received a less share of the market compared to its competitors."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The soil pH near neutrality along with a reduced Eh lead to a higher fertiliser efficiency because plants release less share of their photosynthetic production as root exudate in order to adjust the redox potential of the soil ensuring homeostasis (Husson 2013).

Ecological Processes

It uncovered various and genotype-specific expression patterns of DEGs, and the down-regulation and less share of co-expressed DEGs were dominated in both genotypes.

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

The effect is less comment on shared comment, but there is also less sharing of news stories.

The Guardian - Tech

Closed access only allows particular users into the femtocell service with less sharing of bandwidth.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

He's seeing more, not less, sharing of personal information all the time.

Forbes

While considerable effort has gone into designing appropriate monitoring frameworks and indicators for marine and coastal management, there has been less sharing of the mechanics of approaches that maximise collaboration and learning by multiple stakeholders.

Ocean & Coastal Management

Many believe that secrecy has increased, that there is less sharing of data and techniques between laboratories, and that research and development efforts that build on initial discoveries are being stymied.

SEP

Note that Koenig et al. reported even less sharing of integron genes (< 10%) among 12 Vibrio isolates [ 26].

BMC Evolutionary Biology

In the context of competing priorities including housing, employment and legal implications of injecting, hepatitis C was viewed to be of less consequence by some study participants who injected drugs, but modification of risk behaviours (such as cleaning of syringes and spoons, and less sharing of injecting paraphernalia) was reported [ 53, 54].

BMC Public Health

Many of the MYH7B sites that displayed tissue-associated hypomethylation in skeletal muscle also had little or no methylation in heart DNA; however, in OBSCN there was less sharing of hypomethylated sites between these two types of muscle (Figs. 5 and 6 ; Figs S4 and S5 ).

Epigenetics

For example, transporters were allowed to enter the stables in fewer herds in our study (28% compared with 44% in the previous study), and there was more use of quarantine for purchased animals (89% versus 74%) and of providing farm-specific clothes for visitors (90% versus 85%) and less sharing of equipment with other farms (28% versus 57%).

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a reduced portion, use grammatically sound alternatives like "smaller share of" or "reduced amount of" to ensure clarity and correctness.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "less share of" as it's not grammatically correct. Opt for more standard expressions to maintain clarity and credibility in your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less share of" attempts to function as a determiner phrase indicating a smaller portion or quantity. However, according to Ludwig AI, this phrase is not considered grammatically correct in standard written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "less share of" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. While it appears in various sources, as seen in Ludwig, it's advisable to use alternatives like "smaller share of", "reduced portion of", or "decreased amount of" to maintain clarity and credibility in your writing. Ludwig AI confirms that "less share of" is not correct in standard written English, so opting for grammatically sound alternatives is the best practice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

smaller portion of

Replaces "share" with "portion", emphasizing the quantity aspect.

reduced amount of

Focuses on the "amount" rather than the "share", highlighting the decreased quantity.

decreased percentage of

Uses "percentage" to specify the proportional decrease.

lower fraction of

Emphasizes the fractional aspect of a reduced quantity.

diminished quantity of

Highlights the reduced size or amount.

less proportion of

Uses "proportion" to denote the comparative amount.

limited allocation of

Focuses on a restricted distribution.

smaller allocation of

Emphasizes the reduced distribution size.

less exchange of

Highlights a decreased exchange or transfer.

reduced part of

Simple substitution using "part".

FAQs

How can I correctly use the idea of "less share of" in a sentence?

Instead of "less share of", use phrases like "smaller share of", "reduced portion of", or "decreased amount of" to ensure grammatical accuracy.

What's a more grammatically sound alternative to "less share of"?

Consider using "smaller share of" or "reduced share of" as they are grammatically correct and commonly accepted alternatives.

Is "less share of" grammatically correct?

No, "less share of" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. Use "smaller share of" or "reduced share of" instead.

What is the difference between "less share of" and "smaller share of"?

"Less share of" is not grammatically correct, while "smaller share of" is the correct way to express a reduced portion.