Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
less reliability for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "less reliability for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a decrease in the level of reliability associated with something or someone. Example: "The new software update has resulted in less reliability for the system during peak hours."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
As expected, for 2,4- and 2,5-dichlorophenol, ethylparaben, and benzophenone-3, but not for the other phenols, we observed lower coefficients overall (i.e., less reliability) for samples with longer time intervals between collections.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
2) The incentive bonus is correlated with the electricity price and the nodal reliability, where users receive major incentives for nodes with less reliability (high ENENS), in the same way the price of reliability is higher compared to nodes with high reliability.
Indicators for the appropriateness of care showed less reliability.
Science
The results for the proposed redundant design show a higher reliability level and less reliability degradation in time than compared to braking system designs without redundancy.
As such, less reliability should be expected.
The general principle for determining the sequence length is as follows: the shorter the sequence, the earlier the response--albeit with less reliability.
Lower PSI indicates less reliability [ 38].
I understand why the patient perceives clinics with less reliability.
Science
The five item measure has demonstrated reliability and validity for sitting time on weekdays, but is less reliable for weekends and less structured leisure activities [ 45].
Science
Therefore these SDD values imply to have a rather less satisfactory reliability for assessing individual changes in comparison to group changes.
In addition, some of the change reported for the Adapted Fresno Test may reflect measurement error, because of less-than-perfect interrater reliability for four of the seven questions.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "less reliability for", specify the context or reason for the reduced reliability to provide clarity. For instance, instead of just stating "less reliability for the system", explain "less reliability for the system during peak usage due to increased load".
Common error
Avoid using "less reliability for" without providing specific details. Unsubstantiated claims of reduced reliability can weaken your argument and confuse readers. Instead, offer concrete evidence or examples to support your assertion.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "less reliability for" functions as a modifier indicating a diminution in the quality of being reliable. It connects a subject with a reduced capacity for consistent performance or trustworthiness. Ludwig AI validates this use.
Frequent in
Science
60%
News & Media
20%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
5%
Wiki
5%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "less reliability for" is a grammatically sound way to express a reduction in the dependability or trustworthiness of something. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in English. Though not exceedingly common, its presence in scientific and news sources suggests its appropriateness in both technical and general contexts. When using this phrase, it's vital to provide specific details to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "reduced dependability for" or "lower trustworthiness for" can offer subtle shifts in emphasis, depending on the intended meaning. Overall, "less reliability for" serves as a clear indicator of diminished confidence in a particular subject's performance or consistency.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
reduced dependability for
Replaces "reliability" with "dependability" and "less" with "reduced", maintaining the core meaning of diminished reliability.
lower trustworthiness for
Substitutes "reliability" with "trustworthiness", focusing on the aspect of confidence and trust in the subject.
decreased certainty for
Uses "certainty" in place of "reliability", shifting the focus to the predictability and sureness of the subject.
diminished robustness for
Replaces "reliability" with "robustness", emphasizing the decline in the subject's ability to withstand errors or adverse conditions.
compromised stability for
Focuses on the loss of stability as a result of reduced reliability, highlighting the subject's increased susceptibility to disruption.
weakened assurance for
Emphasizes the weakening of confidence and guarantee associated with the subject, suggesting a decline in expected performance.
less predictability for
Highlights the decline in the ability to foresee or anticipate the behavior or outcome of the subject.
reduced consistency for
Focuses on the lack of uniformity and regularity in the subject's performance or behavior.
inferior performance for
Shifts the focus to the degraded performance of the subject as a result of reduced reliability.
impaired functionality for
Addresses the compromised ability of the subject to function properly or as intended.
FAQs
What does "less reliability for" mean?
The phrase "less reliability for" indicates a decrease in the degree to which something can be depended on to perform consistently or as expected. It suggests a reduction in trustworthiness or predictability.
How can I use "less reliability for" in a sentence?
You can use "less reliability for" to describe situations where something is not as dependable as it once was or should be. For example, "The aging infrastructure leads to "reduced reliability for" the power grid".
What are some alternatives to "less reliability for"?
Alternatives include phrases such as "decreased dependability for", "reduced trustworthiness for", or "lower certainty for". The best choice depends on the specific context.
Is it grammatically correct to say "less reliability for"?
Yes, "less reliability for" is grammatically correct. It accurately conveys the concept of a reduction in reliability. Ludwig AI also confirms that the phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested