Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
less prevalent than
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "less prevalent than" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the frequency or occurrence of two different things, indicating that one is not as common as the other. Example: "The use of traditional media is less prevalent than digital media in today's society."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Some state mental hospitals remain, but they are much less prevalent than they once were.
Academia
Knapp's group showed that brown dwarfs are less prevalent than theoretical estimates had suggested.
Academia
Group II alveolates, in contrast, were much less prevalent than previously reported.
Bacterial nodulation is much less prevalent than in either of the other two subfamilies.
Encyclopedias
Family life is central to most Jamaicans, although formal marriages are less prevalent than in most other countries.
Encyclopedias
Although there is little data, there is no reason to believe it is less prevalent than elsewhere in the world.
News & Media
First, Campbell said, fighting — and rough stuff in general — is less prevalent than when he played in the N.H.L. from the mid-1970s thethe mid-80s.
News & Media
We note that the 5 ns tail from 1P is shorter and less prevalent than the 9 ns tail from 2P-TRPL at the surface.
Science & Research
Several gay leaders said that outright discrimination against gay people in the workplace is undoubtedly much less prevalent than in the past.
News & Media
* Testing in grades PK-2 is less prevalent than in other grades, but survey results indicate that testing in these grades is common as well.
News & Media
Splenic artery pseudoaneurysms are less prevalent than true SAA.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When comparing the prevalence of two phenomena, ensure that the categories being compared are clearly defined. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens the comparison.
Common error
Avoid using "than" with non-comparative adjectives. For example, don't say "less prevalent to" – always use "than" to ensure grammatical correctness.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "less prevalent than" functions as a comparative adjective phrase. It's used to compare the frequency or commonality of one thing relative to another, indicating that one occurs to a smaller extent than the other. As supported by Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely used.
Frequent in
Science
46%
News & Media
29%
Academia
13%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
5%
Wiki
1%
Formal & Business
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "less prevalent than" is a grammatically sound and widely used comparative phrase, as confirmed by Ludwig. It serves to compare the frequency or occurrence of two items, indicating that one is rarer than the other. Predominantly found in scientific and news-related contexts, it maintains a neutral register suitable for diverse writing styles. For alternative expressions, consider options like ""not as common as"" or "less frequent than" to achieve similar comparative meanings.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
not as common as
Replaces "less prevalent" with a more common and straightforward expression of comparison.
less frequent than
Substitutes "prevalent" with "frequent", focusing on the rate of occurrence.
not as widespread as
Replaces "prevalent" with "widespread", emphasizing the extent of distribution.
less usual than
Uses "usual" instead of "prevalent", highlighting the typicality of an event.
less often than
Focuses on the frequency of occurrence using the adverb "often".
rarer compared to
Employs "rarer" to stress the uncommon nature of something in comparison.
less typical than
Replaces "prevalent" with "typical", indicating a lower degree of expectedness.
occurs less than
Uses a verb-centered structure to directly state the lower occurrence rate.
infrequent compared to
Uses the adjective "infrequent" to describe the comparative rarity.
scarcer than
Substitutes with "scarcer", emphasizing a lack of availability or presence.
FAQs
How can I use "less prevalent than" in a sentence?
Use "less prevalent than" to compare the frequency or occurrence of two different things, indicating that one is not as common as the other. For example, "The use of traditional media is "not as common as" digital media in today's society."
What's the difference between "less prevalent than" and "less common than"?
The phrases "less prevalent than" and "less common than" are largely interchangeable. "Less prevalent than" might be seen as slightly more formal, but both convey the same meaning of one thing occurring less frequently than another.
What are some alternatives to saying "less prevalent than"?
You can use alternatives like ""not as common as"", "less frequent than", or "not as widespread as" depending on the specific context.
Is it always correct to use "less prevalent than"?
Yes, "less prevalent than" is grammatically correct and widely accepted. Just ensure that you are using it to compare two distinct items or phenomena where one genuinely occurs less often than the other.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested