less participation by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less participation by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a decrease in the involvement or engagement of a particular group or individual in an activity or event. Example: "The project faced challenges due to less participation by the community members, which affected its overall success."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

But Altria objects to the treaty's calls for higher taxes and less participation by the industry in regulatory discussions, he added.

The New York Times

Adding to the turmoil in the bond market, traders said, was less participation by Wall Street firms, which were unwilling to take on big new trading positions near the end of their fiscal year.

The New York Times

It was the people who got the short end of the stick in the mailmen's rebellion, and it is the people who get squeezed by the inflation and who wait at the airports while the air controllers use the slowdown against the Government; but the remedy for this is not less participation by the people in politics but more.

The New York Times

PISCO at one point had partners in South Africa, Chile, and New Zealand, but after 6 years the funding dried up, and now there's much less participation by those countries.

Science Magazine

Reading the list of exhibitors calls attention to the increased participation of Latin American galleries and less participation by Miami galleries.

Huffington Post

There was considerably less participation by EMTs employed by the Irish State (10 %) such as the Defence Forces, Irish Health Service, An Garda Síochána (police), Fire Service, Coastguard, etc. and private ambulance services (10%%) with those described as 'not affiliated' to an organisation (5%%).

BMC Health Services Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

Direction of mismatch was calculated by counting number of patients whose preferred participation was different from perceived participation (preferred more, or preferred less participation than perceived) divided it by the total number of participants.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Perhaps the "enormous ash flow" your correspondent alludes to might be reduced by more volunteerism and less participation of political operatives.

The New York Times - Magazine

Increased age by one year increased the likelihood for less participation restrictions, OR = 1.06 (1.06-1.06.

BMC Health Services Research

"There just seems to be less participation".

The New York Times

Daniel R. Gould, who directs the Institute for the Study of Youth Sports at Michigan State University, notes that if the climate that's created by coaches and parents focuses on "outcomes or social comparisons" — as opposed to self-improvement — you get "less participation and less skill development".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less participation by", ensure the context clearly specifies the group or entity whose involvement is reduced. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "less participation by" without clearly specifying who is participating less. Omitting this information can lead to confusion and weaken the statement's impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less participation by" functions as a modifier, indicating a reduction in the involvement or contribution of a specified entity. This is supported by Ludwig AI's assessment of the phrase's usability.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

43%

Formal & Business

14%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "less participation by" is a grammatically correct phrase used to denote a reduction in the involvement or contribution of a specific group or entity. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. While versatile across various contexts like News & Media and Science, it's crucial to clearly specify who is participating less to avoid ambiguity. For more formal settings, alternatives like "reduced involvement by" may be preferred.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Reduced involvement by

Replaces "participation" with "involvement", emphasizing the degree of engagement.

Decreased engagement by

Substitutes "participation" with "engagement", highlighting active commitment.

Diminished contribution from

Emphasizes the lessening of input or support.

Lower attendance by

Focuses on physical presence or representation.

Limited activity by

Highlights a restriction in the level of action or operation.

Weaker representation by

Indicates a reduced level of advocacy or voice.

Scaled-back participation by

Implies a deliberate reduction in the scope of involvement.

Reduced input from

Focuses on the decrease of information or ideas provided.

Lesser role played by

Emphasizes a diminished part or function.

Curtailment of activity by

Suggests a formal reduction or termination of actions.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "less participation by" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider alternatives like "reduced involvement by", "decreased engagement by", or "diminished contribution from". These options offer a more professional feel while maintaining a similar meaning.

Is "less participation by" grammatically correct?

Yes, "less participation by" is grammatically sound. It correctly indicates a decrease in the involvement of a specified group or entity. According to Ludwig, this phrase is usable in written English.

What does "less participation by" mean?

The phrase "less participation by" means a reduction in the degree to which a particular group or individual is involved in an activity or event. It suggests a decline in their contribution or engagement.

Are there situations where I should avoid using "less participation by"?

While grammatically correct, "less participation by" might sound awkward in some contexts. If you need to emphasize the positive impact of fewer participants, consider using alternatives like "streamlined process" or "more efficient workflow" instead.