less limits

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less limits" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts discussing reducing restrictions or constraints, but it is better to use more conventional expressions. Example: "We aim to create a system with less limits on creativity and innovation."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Once they got a brand new identity, they just had way less meaning attached to who they were, which meant less limits on their capabilities.

Huffington Post

Single-strand oligodeoxynucleotides (ssODNs) can be injected at high concentration, but their relatively small size (∼200 bp or less) limits the types of edits that can be introduced.

Genetics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Mick explains: "I thought it was much less limiting.

The Guardian - Music

So why is it we can't offer our black actors less limiting roles?

Independent

But that process is "a bundle of logistical hurdles, which are no less limiting to freedom of expression," Attalah added.

The New York Times

But an eye-to-eye discussion with the offending party can be even better and less limiting.

The New York Times - Magazine

Otherwise, Gmail is infinitely cleaner, faster, more useful, more efficient, less commercial and less limiting than other Web-based e-mail services.

The New York Times - Tech

As access to elite status became less limited through family ties and more open to men of new wealth, New Yorkers found a new mechanism of social closure.

The New York Times

Men, who are accustomed to having women deal most fully with the consequences of that unavoidable requirement, may be more able to see it as less limiting.

The New York Times

For those who want a less limiting live connection, Omnisky offers a $299 wireless modem for Palm V handhelds and unlimited access for $39.95 a month in most metropolitan areas in the United States.

The New York Times - Tech

As an alternative, the second treatment option of debridement and decompression alone with less limiting treatment after surgery was introduced.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to convey reduced restrictions, opt for phrases like "fewer restrictions" or "reduced constraints" for improved clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "less" before plural countable nouns such as "limits". Instead, use "fewer" to maintain grammatical accuracy. "Less" is typically used with uncountable nouns (e.g., "less water", "less time").

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less limits" functions as a noun phrase intended to denote a reduction in restrictions or constraints. However, due to grammatical inaccuracy, it is not standard. As Ludwig AI clarifies, it's better to use grammatically correct options.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Wiki

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "less limits" aims to express a reduction in restrictions, it's grammatically incorrect due to the misuse of "less" with the countable noun "limits". Ludwig AI suggests that more appropriate alternatives include "fewer restrictions" or "reduced constraints", which are grammatically sound and widely accepted. Given its grammatical issues, it is advisable to avoid "less limits" in formal contexts. Although the phrase appears in various sources, its infrequent usage and grammatical incorrectness make it a less desirable choice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

fewer restrictions

Replaces "less" with "fewer" for countable nouns like "restrictions", making the phrase grammatically correct and more common.

reduced constraints

Substitutes "limits" with "constraints" and "less" with "reduced", providing a more formal and grammatically sound alternative.

decreased limitations

Uses "decreased" instead of "less" to describe "limitations", which is more grammatically standard.

mitigated boundaries

Employs "mitigated" to suggest a reduction in the impact of "boundaries", offering a nuanced alternative.

loosened restrictions

Replaces "less" with "loosened" to describe a more relaxed set of "restrictions".

relaxed limitations

Similar to 'loosened restrictions' but uses 'limitations' instead of 'restrictions', indicating a more formal tone.

less constraint

Uses singular "constraint" instead of plural "limits", altering the meaning to emphasize a general lack of restriction.

fewer constraints

Similar to 'fewer restrictions', but using 'constraints' to denote limitations.

reduced obstacles

Focuses on reducing "obstacles" rather than "limits", shifting the emphasis to challenges being lessened.

easing limitations

Expresses the act of making limitations less severe.

FAQs

Is it grammatically correct to say "less limits"?

No, it is not grammatically correct. "Less" should be used with uncountable nouns. With countable nouns like "limits", the correct term is "fewer". A grammatically correct alternative would be "fewer restrictions".

What's a more common way to express "less limits"?

More common alternatives include "fewer restrictions", "reduced constraints", or "decreased limitations". These phrases are more standard and easily understood.

When should I use "fewer limits" instead of "less limits"?

Use "fewer restrictions" whenever you are referring to a countable number of limits. "Fewer" is appropriate for plural nouns that can be counted, while "less" is for singular, uncountable nouns.

What is the difference between "less limits" and "less limitation"?

"Less limitation" is grammatically acceptable because "limitation" is singular and uncountable in this context. However, it is generally better to use a countable term like "fewer restrictions" or "reduced constraints" for clarity and conventional usage.