Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
less in number
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "less in number" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing quantities, particularly when referring to a smaller count of items or people. Example: "There were less in number than we had anticipated at the event."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
24 human-written examples
In CV condition, the spots are bigger but less in number than in OV condition.
Moreover –OH present on the surface of the core is less in number when core is covered by shell.
Science
However, the plasmon resonance study (Fig. 3) showed a red shift, indicating the presence of larger particles (Fig. 2b), though they were less in number (Fig. 2a).
Science
Even when they exist, they are less in number and lower in error than the ones obtained by the standard method (compare Figure 19a and 19b).
This increasing pattern in is directly relational to number of PUs ; that is, when the available PUs in an SU's neighborhood are less in number, the message exchange between the users is not high.
Currently, undifferentiated cells are found in all tissue and term as local stem cells which are quiescent in nature and less in number under normal healthy conditions but activate upon injury and repair the tissue or organs via automated activating mechanism.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
36 human-written examples
The triangular shaped particles are less in numbers.
Science
The less in numbers but more significant in terms of functions has made the nsSNPs an ideal marker type in complex trait association analysis.
Science
SEM analysis revealed the presence of fibre cell initials in the fl mutant, though very less in numbers as compared to WT. Fibre initials could be seen two days before anthesis (−2 dpa) in the WT and were more prominent at 0 dpa.
Science
OxyContin prescriptions have more or less doubled in number each year since its release; the company's revenues from the pill jumped to $1.14 billion in 2000 from $55 million in 1996.
News & Media
It is worth noting that after one day after immunization, there was even less variation in number of bacilli recovered in the lung (Fig. 1A).
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When comparing countable items, consider using "fewer in number" instead of "less in number" for enhanced grammatical precision. While "less" is acceptable in many contexts, "fewer" is strictly correct for countable nouns.
Common error
Avoid using "less" when "fewer" is grammatically appropriate. Remember that "less" is generally used for uncountable nouns (e.g., less water), while "fewer" is used for countable nouns (e.g., fewer coins). For example, instead of saying "less coins", say "fewer coins".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "less in number" functions as a comparative quantifier, indicating a smaller quantity or count compared to something else. Ludwig AI confirms this usage through numerous examples across various contexts.
Frequent in
Science
63%
News & Media
15%
Formal & Business
7%
Less common in
Wiki
4%
Encyclopedias
4%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "less in number" is a commonly used phrase that indicates a smaller quantity or count. While acceptable in most contexts, the grammatically precise alternative "fewer in number" is often preferred when referring to countable items, according to Ludwig AI's analysis. The phrase is frequently found in scientific and news-related content, serving the purpose of quantitatively comparing different entities. When aiming for utmost precision, especially in formal writing, consider using "fewer" instead of "less" before countable nouns. Remember, "less" is usually reserved for uncountable nouns.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
fewer in number
This alternative is a grammatically precise synonym, often preferred when referring to countable items.
smaller in quantity
This alternative focuses on the amount, suitable when the exact count is not as important as the overall size.
reduced in quantity
This alternative emphasizes the act of decreasing the amount.
diminished in amount
Similar to 'reduced', but suggests a more gradual decrease.
lower in count
A straightforward alternative focusing on the numerical value.
scarcer in supply
Highlights the limited availability of something.
a minority
Indicates a smaller group or portion compared to the whole.
dwindling in size
Emphasizes the process of becoming smaller over time.
depleted in stock
Suggests that the available amount has been significantly reduced.
in short supply
Focuses on the limited availability of something, often due to demand or scarcity.
FAQs
When should I use "fewer in number" instead of "less in number"?
Use "fewer in number" when referring to countable items. For example, "There are "fewer in number" of apples than oranges." "Less in number" is more appropriate for uncountable items.
What are some alternatives to saying "less in number"?
You can use alternatives like "smaller in quantity", "reduced in quantity", or simply "fewer" depending on the context.
Is "less in number" grammatically correct?
Yes, "less in number" is generally considered grammatically acceptable, especially in informal contexts. However, for strict grammatical correctness, ""fewer in number"" is preferred when referring to countable items.
What's the difference between "less in number" and "smaller amount"?
"Less in number" specifically refers to a lower count of individual items. "Smaller amount" is more general and can refer to a reduced quantity of something, whether countable or uncountable.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested